Baumgartner Michael
Department of Philosophy, University of Bergen, Postboks 7805, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Qual Quant. 2022;56(4):1939-1963. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
Some methodologists take the search target of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to be causal INUS-conditions, others contend that QCA should instead be used to search for some form of sufficiency that is more substantive than mere Boolean sufficiency. While the notion of an INUS-condition has a long and uncontroversial definitional history, Adrian Dusa, in a recent paper, is the first to explicitly define a notion of substantive sufficiency, which he labels . Dusa's definition, however, is vacuous in real-life research contexts. As an alternative, the first part of this paper non-vacuously defines robust sufficiency and supplies a corresponding notion of minimality, which-I argue-captures Dusa's conceptual intentions. In the second part, I then report and discuss the results of a series of simulation experiments benchmarking the performance of the different QCA solution types in recovering robust sufficiency and minimality.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z.
一些方法论学者认为定性比较分析(QCA)的搜索目标是因果INUS条件,另一些人则主张QCA应转而用于寻找某种比单纯布尔充分性更具实质性的充分性形式。虽然INUS条件的概念有着悠久且无争议的定义历史,但阿德里安·杜萨在最近一篇论文中首次明确界定了一种实质性充分性的概念,并将其标记为 。然而,杜萨的定义在现实生活研究背景中是空洞的。作为一种替代方案,本文第一部分对稳健充分性进行了非空洞的定义,并提供了相应的最小性概念,我认为这一概念抓住了杜萨的概念意图。在第二部分,我接着报告并讨论了一系列模拟实验的结果,这些实验以不同QCA解决方案类型在恢复稳健充分性和最小性方面的表现为基准。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z获取的补充材料。