Valenzuela Pedro L, Alejo Lidia B, Montalvo-Pérez Almudena, Gil-Cabrera Jaime, Talavera Eduardo, Lucia Alejandro, Barranco-Gil David
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Physical Activity and Health Laboratory, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital '12 de Octubre' ('imas12'), Madrid, Spain.
Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 9;12:676484. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.676484. eCollection 2021.
To analyze the relationship between critical power (CP) and different lactate threshold (LT2) markers in cyclists. Seventeen male recreational cyclists [33 ± 5 years, peak power output (PO) = 4.5 ± 0.7 W/kg] were included in the study. The PO associated with four different fixed (onset of blood lactate accumulation) and individualized (Dmax, Dmax, and LT) LT2 markers was determined during a maximal incremental cycling test, and CP was calculated from three trials of 1-, 5-, and 20-min duration. The relationship and agreement between each LT2 marker and CP were then analyzed. Strong correlations ( = 0.81-0.98 for all markers) and trivial-to-small non-significant differences (Hedges' = 0.01-0.17, bias = 1-9 W, and > 0.05) were found between all LT2 markers and CP with the exception of Dmax, which showed the strongest correlation but was slightly higher than the CP (Hedges' = 0.43, bias = 20 W, and < 0.001). Wide limits of agreement (LoA) were, however, found for all LT2 markers compared with CP (from ±22 W for Dmax to ±52 W for Dmax), and unclear to most likely practically meaningful differences (PO differences between markers >1%, albeit <5%) were found between markers attending to magnitude-based inferences. LT2 markers show a strong association and overall trivial-to-small differences with CP. Nevertheless, given the wide LoA and the likelihood of potentially meaningful differences between these endurance-related markers, caution should be employed when using them interchangeably.
分析自行车运动员的临界功率(CP)与不同乳酸阈(LT2)标志物之间的关系。17名男性业余自行车运动员[33±5岁,最大功率输出(PO)=4.5±0.7W/kg]纳入本研究。在最大递增骑行测试中确定与四种不同的固定(血乳酸积累起始点)和个体化(Dmax、Dmax和LT)LT2标志物相关的PO,并通过1分钟、5分钟和20分钟时长的三次试验计算CP。然后分析每个LT2标志物与CP之间的关系和一致性。除Dmax外,所有LT2标志物与CP之间均发现强相关性(所有标志物的r=0.81-0.98)和微小至小的非显著差异(Hedges'g=0.01-0.17,偏差=1-9W,且p>0.05),Dmax显示出最强的相关性,但略高于CP(Hedges'g=0.43,偏差=20W,且p<0.001)。然而,与CP相比,所有LT2标志物均发现较宽的一致性界限(LoA)(从Dmax的±22W到Dmax的±52W),并且根据基于量级的推断,在标志物之间发现不明确至最可能具有实际意义的差异(标志物之间的PO差异>1%,尽管<5%)。LT2标志物与CP显示出强关联和总体微小至小的差异。然而,鉴于较宽的LoA以及这些耐力相关标志物之间可能存在有意义差异的可能性,在互换使用它们时应谨慎。