Makowski Anna C, Schomerus Georg, von dem Knesebeck Olaf
Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 9;12:666489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.666489. eCollection 2021.
The notion that depression is a disorder that moves along a continuum is well-established. Similarly, the belief in the continuity of mental illness is considered an important element in the stigma process. Against this background, it is the aim of this study to examine whether public continuum beliefs vary with the severity of depressive symptoms. Analyses were based on computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) conducted in winter 2019/2020 in Germany ( = 1,009, response rate 46.8%). Using three vignettes representing mild, moderate, and severe depressive symptoms, beliefs regarding the continuity of symptoms, specifically a fundamental difference, were assessed with seven items. Sociodemographic characteristics and own experiences with depression (affliction and contact) were introduced as covariates. Significant differences between the three groups of severity were found for the majority of the items measuring continuum beliefs or perceived fundamental difference. However, only few items showed a linear trend indicating a parallel between symptom severity and beliefs. Multivariate regression models showed that a moderate degree of depression was positively associated with stronger continuum beliefs but also with greater perceived difference compared to the mild degree, while no significant associations emerged for the severe vignette. Although a comparison of our sample with official statistics supports the external validity, we cannot rule out a selection bias. It is arguable in how far short case vignettes convey a holistic picture of a person affected by depressive symptoms. Our results do not indicate a parallel between symptom severity and public continuum beliefs.
抑郁症是一种沿着连续体发展的疾病这一观念已得到充分确立。同样,对精神疾病连续性的信念被认为是污名化过程中的一个重要因素。在此背景下,本研究的目的是检验公众对连续体的信念是否会随抑郁症状的严重程度而变化。分析基于2019/2020年冬季在德国进行的计算机辅助电话访谈(CATIs)(n = 1,009,应答率46.8%)。使用代表轻度、中度和重度抑郁症状的三个 vignette,通过七个项目评估了关于症状连续性的信念,特别是根本差异。将社会人口学特征以及自身的抑郁经历(患病和接触情况)作为协变量引入。在测量连续体信念或感知到的根本差异的大多数项目中,发现三组严重程度之间存在显著差异。然而,只有少数项目呈现出线性趋势,表明症状严重程度与信念之间存在平行关系。多元回归模型显示,与轻度抑郁相比,中度抑郁与更强的连续体信念呈正相关,但也与更大的感知差异相关,而重度 vignette 未出现显著关联。尽管将我们的样本与官方统计数据进行比较支持了外部有效性,但我们不能排除选择偏差。简短的病例 vignette 在多大程度上能够传达受抑郁症状影响者的整体情况是有争议的。我们的结果并未表明症状严重程度与公众对连续体的信念之间存在平行关系。