Vassou Christina, Georgousopoulou Ekavi N, Chrysohoou Christina, Yannakoulia Mary, Pitsavos Christos, Cropley Mark, Panagiotakos Demosthenes B
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 May 18;20(1):727-739. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00805-3. eCollection 2021 Jun.
To investigate the combined role of irrational beliefs, anxiety and depression in the 10-year incidence of type 2 diabetes, and the underlying effect of biochemical, and socio-behavioural factors.
Within the context of the ATTICA cohort study (2002-2012), 853 participants without evidence of CVD [453 men (45 ± 13 years) and 400 women (44 ± 18 years)] underwent psychological evaluation through the Irrational Beliefs Inventory (IBI) (range 0-88), the Zung Self-Rating-Depression-Scale (ZDRS) and the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI). Diagnosis of diabetes at follow-up examination was based on the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA).
Mean IBI score was 53 ± 10 in men and 51 ± 11 in women (p = 0.68). Participants with high irrational beliefs who also had anxiety symptoms had a 93% excess risk of developing diabetes during the 10-year follow-up (Hazard Ratio 1.93; 95%CI 1.34, 2.78) as compared to those without anxiety. Moreover, diabetes risk was 73% higher among individuals with high levels of irrational beliefs and depression as compared to those where depression was absent (1.73; 1.21, 2.46). Lower education status, family history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, high BMI, as well as tumor necrosis factor and total antioxidant capacity were revealed as mediating risk factors related to the tested associations.
Irrational beliefs among apparently healthy adults trigger depression and anxiety symptomatology, and through the increased inflammation and oxidative stress profile, were associated with increased diabetes risk. This observation moves psychological research a step forward in supporting and guiding primary prevention of mental health and metabolic conditions.
探讨不合理信念、焦虑和抑郁在2型糖尿病10年发病率中的联合作用,以及生化和社会行为因素的潜在影响。
在阿提卡队列研究(2002 - 2012年)中,853名无心血管疾病证据的参与者[453名男性(45±13岁)和400名女性(44±18岁)]通过不合理信念量表(IBI)(范围0 - 88)、zung自评抑郁量表(ZDRS)和状态 - 特质焦虑量表(STAI)进行了心理评估。随访检查时糖尿病的诊断基于美国糖尿病协会(ADA)的标准。
男性的平均IBI评分为53±10,女性为51±11(p = 0.68)。与无焦虑症状的参与者相比,具有高不合理信念且有焦虑症状的参与者在10年随访期间患糖尿病的风险高出93%(风险比1.93;95%置信区间1.34,2.78)。此外,与无抑郁的个体相比,具有高不合理信念和抑郁的个体患糖尿病的风险高73%(1.73;1.21,2.46)。较低的教育水平、糖尿病家族史、高胆固醇血症、高体重指数,以及肿瘤坏死因子和总抗氧化能力被揭示为与所测试关联相关的中介风险因素。
明显健康的成年人中的不合理信念引发抑郁和焦虑症状,并通过增加炎症和氧化应激水平,与糖尿病风险增加相关。这一观察结果使心理学研究在支持和指导心理健康和代谢疾病的一级预防方面向前迈进了一步。