• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015 年健康信息技术认证版对医院间互操作性的影响。

Impact of the 2015 Health Information Technology Certification Edition on Interoperability among Hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):1866-1873. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab083.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocab083
PMID:34179983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8363795/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most nonfederal acute care hospitals use electronic health records (EHRs) certified by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. In 2015, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology finalized the 2015 Health IT Certification Edition and adoption by hospitals began in 2016. We examine the impact of the 2015 Edition on rates of interoperable exchange among nonfederal acute hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study applies a standard difference-in-differences design and a recently developed fixed effects estimator that relaxes the assumption of treatment effects being constant across groups and time. In the analysis, we identify separate effects of the 2015 Edition for hospitals that switched EHR developers and forecast hospitals' interoperability over 2015 Edition adoption rates.

RESULTS

The adoption of the 2015 Edition increased hospitals' rates of interoperable exchange and especially benefited hospitals that switched EHR developers in the post-implementation period. Forecasting results indicate that if all hospitals adopted the 2015 Edition, 53% to 61% of hospitals would engage in interoperable health information exchange compared with the current rate of 46%.

DISCUSSION

Hospitals' levels of interoperability have been rising over the last few years. Adoption of newer technology improved hospitals' interoperability and accounts for up to 12% of the rise in interoperability.

CONCLUSIONS

Certified technology is one mechanism to ensure providers use recent and safe technologies for interoperable exchange. Adoption of certified EHRs improves the nation's interoperable exchange; however, it has a clear limited effect. Other mechanisms are necessary for achieving comprehensive interoperable exchange.

摘要

目的

大多数非联邦急性护理医院都使用经国家卫生信息技术协调员办公室认证的电子健康记录 (EHR)。2015 年,国家卫生信息技术协调员办公室最终确定了 2015 年健康信息技术认证版,并于 2016 年开始在医院采用。我们研究了 2015 版对非联邦急性医院之间互操作性交换率的影响。

材料和方法

该研究采用标准的差异-差异设计和最近开发的固定效应估计器,放宽了处理效果在组间和时间上保持不变的假设。在分析中,我们确定了 2015 版对切换电子病历开发商的医院的单独影响,并预测了医院在 2015 版采用率下的互操作性。

结果

采用 2015 版提高了医院互操作性交换的速度,尤其是在实施后阶段受益于切换电子病历开发商的医院。预测结果表明,如果所有医院都采用 2015 版,将有 53%至 61%的医院参与互操作性健康信息交换,而目前的比例为 46%。

讨论

过去几年来,医院的互操作性水平一直在上升。采用新技术提高了医院的互操作性,占互操作性提高的 12%。

结论

认证技术是确保提供者使用最新和安全技术进行互操作性交换的一种机制。采用认证的电子病历提高了国家的互操作性交换;然而,它的效果是有限的。需要其他机制才能实现全面的互操作性交换。

相似文献

1
Impact of the 2015 Health Information Technology Certification Edition on Interoperability among Hospitals.2015 年健康信息技术认证版对医院间互操作性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):1866-1873. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab083.
2
New EHR certification requirements and their association with duplicate tests and images.新的电子健康记录认证要求及其与重复检测和影像的关系。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jul 12;29(8):1391-1399. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac076.
3
2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications. Final rule.《2015年版健康信息技术(健康IT)认证标准》、《2015年版基础电子健康记录(EHR)定义》以及美国国家卫生信息技术协调办公室(ONC)健康IT认证计划修改。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2015 Oct 16;80(200):62601-759.
4
Asymmetric Interoperability as a Strategy Among Provider Group Health Information Exchange: Directional Analysis.供应商集团健康信息交换中的非对称互操作性策略:定向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43127. doi: 10.2196/43127.
5
Adoption and use of various health information exchange methods for sending inside health information in US hospitals.美国医院内部发送健康信息的各种健康信息交换方法的采用和使用。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105156. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
6
Uncovering differences in interoperability across hospital size.揭示不同规模医院在互操作性方面的差异。
Healthc (Amst). 2019 Dec;7(4). doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Hospital adoption of interoperability functions.医院采用互操作性功能。
Healthc (Amst). 2019 Sep;7(3):100347. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility.医院采用多种健康信息交换方法和信息可及性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):577-583. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa003.
9
Health information technology for ambulatory care in health systems.卫生系统中门诊护理的健康信息技术。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Jan;26(1):32-38. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42143.
10
Interoperability Progress and Remaining Data Quality Barriers of Certified Health Information Technologies.认证健康信息技术的互操作性进展及剩余的数据质量障碍
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:358-367. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.将健康数据转化为可操作的信息:健康信息交换的最新进展和未来机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):203-214. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.