Suppr超能文献

按 Khorana 评分风险水平分层的癌症患者的医疗保健费用。

Healthcare costs of patients with cancer stratified by Khorana score risk levels.

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Advanced Cancer Research Group., Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):866-873. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1948681.

Abstract

AIMS

Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which entails a high economic burden. The risk of cancer-associated VTE can be assessed using the Khorana score (KS), a validated VTE risk prediction algorithm. This study compared healthcare costs associated with different KS in a population of patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

The Optum Clinformatics DataMart database (01/01/2012-09/30/2017) was used to select adult patients with ≥1 hospitalization or ≥2 outpatient claims with a cancer diagnosis (index date) initiated on systemic therapy or radiation therapy. Patients were classified in mutually exclusive cohorts based on KS (i.e. KS = 0, 1, 2 or ≥3). The observation period spanned from index to the earliest among the end of data availability, death, end of insurance coverage, or 12 months.

RESULTS

In total 6,194 patients (KS = 0: 2,488; KS = 1: 2,125; KS = 2: 1,074; KS ≥ 3: 507) were included. On average, patients were aged 68 years, 48-52% were female, and the Quan-Charlson comorbidity index ranged between 1.1 and 1.4. Over the observation period, all-cause total healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were $8,826 (KS = 0), $11,598 (KS = 1), $14,028 (KS = 2), and $16,211 (KS ≥ 3). Using the KS = 0 cohort as a reference, adjusted PPPM costs were $2,506, $4,775, and $6,452 higher in the KS = 1, KS = 2, and KS ≥ 3 cohorts, respectively. Hospitalization and outpatient costs were the main drivers of these differences. Similar results were found for VTE-related costs, which represented 4-11% of the total all-cause cost difference between KS cohorts.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounders; results may not be generalized to patients with other insurance plans or those who received treatments other than systemic therapy or radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis found that cancer patients at higher risk of VTE (based on KS) incurred significantly greater all-cause and VTE-related healthcare costs compared with cancer patients at lower risk of VTE.

摘要

目的

癌症患者存在静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的高风险,这会带来沉重的经济负担。可采用经验证的 VTE 风险预测算法 Khorana 评分(KS)来评估与癌症相关的 VTE 风险。本研究比较了新诊断为癌症的患者群体中,不同 KS 评分与医疗保健成本之间的关系。

方法

使用 Optum Clinformatics DataMart 数据库(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日),选择至少接受过 1 次住院治疗或 2 次以上门诊治疗、接受全身性治疗或放射治疗且诊断为癌症(索引日期)的成年患者。患者根据 KS(0、1、2 或≥3)被归入互斥队列。观察期从索引日期开始,至数据可用结束日期、死亡日期、保险覆盖结束日期或 12 个月时最早的日期截止。

结果

共纳入 6194 例患者(KS = 0:2488 例;KS = 1:2125 例;KS = 2:1074 例;KS≥3:507 例)。患者平均年龄为 68 岁,48%-52%为女性,Quan-Charlson 合并症指数在 1.1 到 1.4 之间。在观察期间,每位患者的全因每月总医疗保健费用(PPPM)为:KS = 0 组为 8826 美元;KS = 1 组为 11598 美元;KS = 2 组为 14028 美元;KS≥3 组为 16211 美元。以 KS = 0 组为参照,KS = 1、KS = 2 和 KS≥3 组的调整后 PPPM 成本分别高出 2506、4775 和 6452 美元。住院和门诊费用是造成这些差异的主要原因。KS 队列之间的总全因成本差异的 4%-11%是由 VTE 相关成本差异造成的,VTE 相关成本也存在类似结果。

局限性

存在残余混杂因素;结果可能不适用于具有其他保险计划或接受除全身性治疗或放射治疗以外治疗的患者。

结论

这项真实世界研究发现,VTE 风险较高(基于 KS)的癌症患者的全因和 VTE 相关医疗保健费用明显高于 VTE 风险较低的癌症患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验