Suppr超能文献

理解乳房重建亚型与财务毒性风险之间的关系:单机构试点研究。

Understanding the Relationship between Breast Reconstruction Subtype and Risk of Financial Toxicity: A Single-Institution Pilot Study.

机构信息

From Proliance Surgeons; the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Health Services Research, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; the University of Texas Houston McGovern Medical School; and the Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):1e-11e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of breast reconstruction on financial toxicity remains poorly understood despite growing awareness. The authors sought to illustrate the relationship between breast reconstruction subtypes and the risk of financial toxicity.

METHODS

The authors conducted a single-institution cross-sectional survey of all female breast cancer patients undergoing any form of breast reconstruction between January of 2018 and June of 2019. Financial toxicity was measured by means of the validated Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity instrument. Demographics, clinical course, and coping strategies were abstracted from a purpose-built survey and electronic medical records. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify associations with financial toxicity.

RESULTS

The authors' analytical sample was 350 patients. One hundred eighty-four (52.6 percent) underwent oncoplastic reconstruction, 126 (36 percent) underwent implant-based reconstruction, and 40 (11.4 percent) underwent autologous reconstruction. Oncoplastic reconstruction recipients were older, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to have supplemental insurance and receive adjuvant hormonal therapy. No significant differences in the risk of financial toxicity were uncovered across breast reconstruction subtypes (p = 0.53). Protective factors against financial toxicity were use of supplemental insurance (p = 0.0003) and escalating annual household income greater than $40,000 (p < 0.0001). Receipt of radiation therapy was positively associated with worsening financial toxicity (-2.69; 95 CI percent, -5.22 to -0.15). Financial coping strategies were prevalent across breast reconstruction subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction subtype does not differentially impact the risk of financial toxicity. Increasing income and supplemental insurance were found to be protective, whereas receipt of radiation therapy was positively associated with financial toxicity. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to identify the main drivers of out-of-pocket costs and financial toxicity in breast cancer care.

摘要

背景

尽管人们对乳腺癌重建对财务毒性的影响的认识不断提高,但仍知之甚少。作者旨在说明乳腺癌重建亚型与财务毒性风险之间的关系。

方法

作者对 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间接受任何形式乳房重建的所有女性乳腺癌患者进行了单机构横断面调查。采用经过验证的综合财务毒性评分量表来衡量财务毒性。从专门设计的调查和电子病历中提取人口统计学、临床病程和应对策略。采用多变量线性回归来确定与财务毒性相关的因素。

结果

作者的分析样本为 350 例患者。184 例(52.6%)患者接受了整形重建术,126 例(36%)患者接受了植入物重建术,40 例(11.4%)患者接受了自体组织重建术。整形重建术接受者年龄较大,体重指数较高,更有可能拥有补充保险并接受辅助激素治疗。在乳房重建亚型中,财务毒性的风险没有明显差异(p = 0.53)。预防财务毒性的保护因素是使用补充保险(p = 0.0003)和年收入超过 40,000 美元(p < 0.0001)。接受放疗与财务毒性恶化呈正相关(-2.69;95%置信区间,-5.22 至-0.15)。在所有乳房重建亚型中,财务应对策略都很普遍。

结论

乳房重建亚型不会对财务毒性的风险产生差异影响。收入增加和补充保险被认为是保护性因素,而接受放疗则与财务毒性呈正相关。需要进行前瞻性、多中心研究,以确定乳腺癌治疗中自付费用和财务毒性的主要驱动因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验