Department of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, McDonald College of McGill University, Sainte-Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
Saint-Hyacinthe Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 8E3, Canada.
J Microbiol Methods. 2021 Aug;187:106275. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106275. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
Four methods were tested for enumerating bacteria present in the absorbent pads (AP) used in packaging chicken and other meats. Viable counts were ascertained at day 0 and day 7 (d0 and d7, respectively). Sampling bacterial cells from AP were carried out using a countertop blender, Stomacher, sonication, and blender in combination to sonication. The release of bacterial cells by breaking down the AP with the blender resulted in the highest CFU counts. At d0, a bacterial recovery rate of 94% was obtained with the blender, while the recovery rates using Stomacher or sonication alone were 58% and 73%, respectively. At d7, the Stomacher treatment also gave the lowest colony forming unit (CFU) values in the AP incubated at 7 °C. Sonication of the AP prior to homogenization with the blender did not increase CFU counts. Results suggested that breaking down the AP with a blender gives higher CFU levels than the Stomacher, which is the most commonly used technique for this purpose.
四种方法用于检测包装鸡肉和其他肉类的吸收垫(AP)中存在的细菌。在第 0 天和第 7 天(分别为 d0 和 d7)确定活菌数。使用台式搅拌机、Stomacher、超声处理和搅拌机结合超声处理从 AP 中采样细菌细胞。用搅拌机分解 AP 会导致细菌细胞释放,从而获得最高的 CFU 计数。在 d0 时,使用搅拌机可获得 94%的细菌回收率,而单独使用 Stomacher 或超声处理的回收率分别为 58%和 73%。在 d7 时,在 7°C 孵育的 AP 中,Stomacher 处理也给出了最低的菌落形成单位(CFU)值。在与搅拌机混合之前对 AP 进行超声处理不会增加 CFU 计数。结果表明,与最常用于此目的的 Stomacher 相比,用搅拌机分解 AP 可获得更高的 CFU 水平。