Suppr超能文献

搅切机在微生物检测实验室中的用途。

Usefulness of the stomacher in a microbiological regulatory laboratory.

作者信息

Andrews W H, Wilson C R, Poelma P L, Romero A, Rude R A, Duran A P, McClure F D, Gentile D E

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jan;35(1):89-93. doi: 10.1128/aem.35.1.89-93.1978.

Abstract

The relative efficiency of the Waring blender, the Stomacher 400, and the Stomacher 3500 for preparing food samples for microbiological analysis was studied. Comparative aerobic plate count (APC) values were determined on 671 samples, representing 30 categories of foods. Of the 26 categories of nonfatty foods, the blender gave significantly higher geometric mean APC values than those given by the Stomacher 400 and the Stomacher 3500 in 65 and 69 percent of the categories, respectively. In a comparison of the two Stomacher models, the Stomacher 400 gave significantly higher geometric mean APC values than these given by the Stomacher 3500 in 73 percent of the food categories. Addition of Tween 80 to four categories of fatty foods at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 percent did not raise the APC values given by either model of stomacher to the levels given by the Waring blender. Overall, the efficiency of both models of Stomacher, relative to the blender and to each other, was specific and depended upon the particular food being analyzed.

摘要

研究了沃林搅拌器、Stomacher 400和Stomacher 3500在制备用于微生物分析的食品样本方面的相对效率。对代表30类食品的671个样本测定了比较需氧平板计数(APC)值。在26类非脂肪食品中,搅拌器在65%和69%的类别中分别给出了显著高于Stomacher 400和Stomacher 3500的几何平均APC值。在比较两种Stomacher型号时,Stomacher 400在73%的食品类别中给出了显著高于Stomacher 3500的几何平均APC值。以0.5%、1.0%和2.0%的浓度向四类脂肪食品中添加吐温80,并未使任何一种Stomacher型号给出的APC值提高到沃林搅拌器给出的水平。总体而言,相对于搅拌器以及彼此而言,两种Stomacher型号的效率是特定的,并且取决于所分析的特定食品。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验