Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 2 rue la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France.
Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1402 ALIVE Research Group, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Crit Care. 2021 Jun 28;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03621-6.
In intensive care units (ICUs), patients experiencing post-extubation respiratory failure have poor outcomes. The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to treat post-extubation respiratory failure may increase the risk of death. This study aims at comparing mortality between patients treated with NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen or high-flow nasal oxygen alone.
Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial focusing on patients who experienced post-extubation respiratory failure within the 7 days following extubation. Patients were classified in the NIV group or the high-flow nasal oxygen group according to oxygenation strategy used after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure. Patients reintubated within the first hour after extubation and those promptly reintubated without prior treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality at day 28 after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure.
Among 651 extubated patients, 158 (25%) experienced respiratory failure and 146 were included in the analysis. Mortality at day 28 was 18% (15/84) using NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen and 29% (18/62) with high flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, - 11% [95% CI, - 25 to 2]; p = 0.12). Among the 46 patients with hypercapnia at the onset of respiratory failure, mortality at day 28 was 3% (1/33) with NIV and 31% (4/13) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, - 28% [95% CI, - 54 to - 6]; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients reintubated 48 h after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure was 44% (37/84) with NIV and 52% (32/62) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone (p = 0.21).
In patients with post-extubation respiratory failure, NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen might not increase the risk of death. Trial registration number The trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT03121482 the 20th April 2017.
在重症监护病房(ICU)中,经历拔管后呼吸衰竭的患者预后较差。使用无创通气(NIV)治疗拔管后呼吸衰竭可能会增加死亡风险。本研究旨在比较使用 NIV 与高流量鼻氧交替治疗与单独使用高流量鼻氧治疗的患者之间的死亡率。
对一项多中心、随机、对照试验进行事后分析,该试验主要关注拔管后 7 天内发生拔管后呼吸衰竭的患者。根据呼吸衰竭发生后使用的氧合策略,将患者分为 NIV 组或高流量鼻氧组。将在拔管后 1 小时内再次插管且未进行前期治疗的患者以及迅速再次插管的患者排除在外。主要结局为拔管后呼吸衰竭发生后第 28 天的死亡率。
在 651 例拔管患者中,有 158 例(25%)发生呼吸衰竭,其中 146 例纳入分析。NIV 与高流量鼻氧交替治疗的第 28 天死亡率为 18%(15/84),单独使用高流量鼻氧治疗的第 28 天死亡率为 29%(18/62)(差异,-11%[95%CI,-25 至 2];p=0.12)。在呼吸衰竭发作时伴有高碳酸血症的 46 例患者中,NIV 治疗的第 28 天死亡率为 3%(1/33),单独使用高流量鼻氧治疗的第 28 天死亡率为 31%(4/13)(差异,-28%[95%CI,-54 至-6];p=0.006)。呼吸衰竭发生后 48 小时再次插管的患者比例,NIV 治疗组为 44%(37/84),高流量鼻氧治疗组为 52%(32/62)(p=0.21)。
在拔管后呼吸衰竭患者中,NIV 与高流量鼻氧交替使用可能不会增加死亡风险。
该试验于 2017 年 4 月 20 日在 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT03121482。