Facultade de Educación e Traballo Social, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense, Spain.
Centro de Investigação e de Intervenção Social do Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (CIS-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):1492-1503. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13479. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
The treatment of the mentally ill people is a challenge across the world, and different professionals, such as doctors, social workers, psychologists, or nurses, take care of this group. Nonetheless, mental health is not a vocational sector preferred by students and professionals of many of these careers. Research has proposed that professional preference for a patient group would be positively influenced by intergroup contact (quantity and quality) and empathy (perspective-taking), and negatively associated with intergroup anxiety and social distance. However, the evidence testing this proposal was partial and mainly referring to other patient groups such as minorities or immigrants. The major aim of this cross-sectional study was to clarify two research questions referring to mentally ill persons: Do contact and empathy protect undergraduates from intergroup anxiety and social distance and promote professional preference? Do intergroup anxiety and social distance predict professional preference and mediate the influence of contact and empathy in professional preference? A convenience sample of 409 Social Work undergraduates (81% females) from three Spanish universities completed a questionnaire between February and June 2020. Concerning direct relationships, the structural equation model showed that the quantity of contact only predicted intergroup anxiety negatively; quality of contact and empathy negatively predicted intergroup anxiety and social distance; intergroup anxiety positively predicted social distance; intergroup anxiety and social distance negatively predicted professional preference. Concerning mediated relationships, the influence of quality of contact and empathy on social distance was mediated by intergroup anxiety; social distance mediated the relationship of intergroup anxiety with professional preference; both anxiety and distance mediated the influence of quality of contact and empathy in professional preference. These results encourage interventions aimed at enhancing professional preference for mental illness by improving contact, knowledge, and empathy and reducing stigma in students and workers from diverse mental health careers.
精神疾病患者的治疗是全世界面临的一个挑战,医生、社会工作者、心理学家或护士等不同专业人员负责照顾这一群体。尽管如此,心理健康并不是许多这些职业的学生和专业人员首选的职业领域。研究表明,对某一患者群体的专业偏好会受到群体间接触(数量和质量)和同理心(换位思考)的积极影响,而与群体间焦虑和社会距离呈负相关。然而,支持这一观点的证据并不全面,主要是指少数民族或移民等其他患者群体。本横断面研究的主要目的是澄清两个关于精神疾病患者的研究问题:接触和同理心是否能保护大学生免受群体间焦虑和社会距离的影响,并促进专业偏好?群体间焦虑和社会距离是否能预测专业偏好,以及在专业偏好中是否能调节接触和同理心的影响?来自西班牙三所大学的 409 名社会工作专业本科生(81%为女性)作为方便样本,在 2020 年 2 月至 6 月期间完成了一份问卷。关于直接关系,结构方程模型表明,接触的数量仅能负向预测群体间焦虑;接触质量和同理心能负向预测群体间焦虑和社会距离;群体间焦虑能正向预测社会距离;群体间焦虑和社会距离能负向预测专业偏好。关于中介关系,接触质量和同理心对社会距离的影响是通过群体间焦虑来介导的;社会距离介导了群体间焦虑与专业偏好之间的关系;焦虑和距离都介导了接触质量和同理心对专业偏好的影响。这些结果鼓励通过提高学生和来自不同心理健康职业的工作人员的接触、知识和同理心,并减少对精神疾病的污名化,来干预以增强对精神疾病的专业偏好。