Department of Pathology, University of California, 10300 Campus Point Drive, Suite 150, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA 92092, USA.
J Anal Toxicol. 2021 Sep 17;45(8):820-828. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab080.
Proving driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) is difficult. Establishing a biomarker of recent use to supplement behavioral observations may be a useful alternative strategy. We determined whether cannabinoid concentrations in blood, oral fluid (OF) or breath could identify use within the past 3 h-likely the period of the greatest impairment. In a randomized trial, 191 frequent (≥4/week) and occasional (<4/week) cannabis users smoked one cannabis (placebo [0.02%], or 5.9% or 13.4% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) cigarette ad libitum. Blood, OF and breath samples were collected prior to and up to 6 h after smoking. Samples were analyzed for 10 cannabinoids in OF, 8 in blood and THC in breath. Frequent users had more residual THC in blood and were more likely to be categorized as 'recently used' prior to smoking; this did not occur in OF. Per se limits ranging from undetectable to 5 ng/mL THC in blood offered limited usefulness as biomarkers of recent use. Cannabinol (CBN, cutoff = 1 ng/mL) in blood offered 100% specificity but only 31.4% sensitivity, resulting in 100% positive predictive value (PPV) and 94.0% negative predictive value (NPV) at 4.3% prevalence; however, CBN may vary by cannabis chemovar. A 10 ng/mL THC cutoff in OF exhibited the overall highest performance to detect its use within 3 h (99.7% specificity, 82.4% sensitivity, 92.5% PPV and 99.2% NPV) but was still detectable in 23.2% of participants ∼4.4 h post-smoking, limiting specificity at later time points. OF THC may be a helpful indicator of recent cannabis intake, but this does not equate to impairment. Behavioral assessment of impairment is still required to determine DUIC. This study only involved cannabis inhalation, and additional research evaluating alternative routes of ingestion (i.e., oral) is needed.
证明吸食大麻后仍有驾驶能力(DUIC)是困难的。建立一个近期使用的生物标志物来补充行为观察可能是一个有用的替代策略。我们旨在确定血液、口腔液(OF)或呼出气中的大麻素浓度是否可以在过去 3 小时内识别使用情况,这段时间可能是影响最大的时期。在一项随机试验中,191 名经常(每周≥4 次)和偶尔(每周<4 次)吸食大麻者随意吸食一支大麻(安慰剂[0.02%]或 5.9%或 13.4%Δ9-四氢大麻酚[THC])香烟。在吸烟前和吸烟后最多 6 小时内采集血液、OF 和呼出气样本。在 OF 中分析了 10 种大麻素,在血液中分析了 8 种大麻素,在呼出气中分析了 THC。经常使用者血液中残留的 THC 较多,在吸烟前更有可能被归类为“近期使用”;而在 OF 中则不会出现这种情况。血液中 THC 本身的检测下限从无法检测到 5ng/mL 对近期使用的生物标志物的检测能力有限。血液中的大麻醇(CBN,截断值=1ng/mL)的特异性为 100%,但敏感性仅为 31.4%,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 100%和 94.0%,在 4.3%的流行率下;然而,CBN 可能因大麻品种而异。OF 中 10ng/mL 的 THC 截断值在检测 3 小时内使用(特异性 99.7%,敏感性 82.4%,PPV 92.5%,NPV 99.2%)的性能总体上最高,但在吸烟后约 4.4 小时仍可检测到 23.2%的参与者,限制了后期的特异性。OF THC 可能是近期摄入大麻的有用指标,但这并不等同于损伤。仍需要对损伤进行行为评估,以确定 DUIC。本研究仅涉及大麻吸入,需要进一步研究评估替代摄入途径(即口服)。