Suppr超能文献

使用水压法进行十二指肠内镜黏膜下剥离术时的大便失禁和口腔反流

Fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation during duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the water pressure method.

作者信息

Takada Yoshihisa, Hirose Takashi, Nishida Kazuki, Kakushima Naomi, Furukawa Kazuhiro, Furune Satoshi, Ishikawa Eri, Sawada Tsunaki, Maeda Keiko, Yamamura Takeshi, Ishikawa Takuya, Ohno Eizaburo, Nakamura Masanao, Honda Takashi, Ishigami Masatoshi, Kawashima Hiroki, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Section, Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2022 Mar;34(3):526-534. doi: 10.1111/den.14070. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the duodenum is challenging. The water pressure method (WP-ESD) has been developed with a decreased rate of perforation. However, details of perioperative adverse events of WP-ESD are unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the frequency and related factors of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation during WP-ESD.

METHODS

A chart-based retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients who underwent duodenal WP-ESD. The saline volume given into the body was calculated in all cases. All adverse events during WP-ESD until 6 weeks were extracted, and factors related to intraoperative fecal incontinence or oral regurgitation were analyzed. The frequency of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation was also compared to those of 83 conventional ESD cases.

RESULTS

In WP-ESD, intraoperative fecal incontinence occurred in 12 (28%), oral regurgitation in six (14%), and aspiration pneumonia in one patient. For fecal incontinence, the infusion speed (saline volume divided by resection time) around 17 mL/min was a significant factor in multivariable analysis. For oral regurgitation, only tumor size was a significant factor in univariate analysis (P = 0.027). Significant difference was observed in the frequency of fecal incontinence between WP-ESD and conventional ESD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), but no difference was observed in oral regurgitation or aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fecal incontinence is a unique adverse event of WP-ESD related to the infusion speed. WP-ESD did not pose a risk for oral regurgitation, but we should be aware of the risk in large tumor cases.

摘要

目的

十二指肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)具有挑战性。已开发出水压法(WP - ESD),其穿孔率有所降低。然而,WP - ESD围手术期不良事件的细节尚不清楚。本研究的目的是阐明WP - ESD期间大便失禁和口腔反流的发生率及相关因素。

方法

对43例行十二指肠WP - ESD的患者进行基于图表的回顾性分析。计算所有病例注入体内的盐水量。提取WP - ESD直至6周期间的所有不良事件,并分析与术中大便失禁或口腔反流相关的因素。还将大便失禁和口腔反流的发生率与83例传统ESD病例的发生率进行比较。

结果

在WP - ESD中,术中大便失禁发生在12例(28%),口腔反流发生在6例(14%),1例患者发生吸入性肺炎。对于大便失禁,多变量分析中输注速度(盐水量除以切除时间)约17 mL/min是一个显著因素。对于口腔反流,单变量分析中仅肿瘤大小是一个显著因素(P = 0.027)。WP - ESD与传统ESD之间在大便失禁发生率上观察到显著差异(28%对0%,P < 0.001),但在口腔反流或吸入性肺炎方面未观察到差异。

结论

术中大便失禁是WP - ESD与输注速度相关的独特不良事件。WP - ESD不会增加口腔反流风险,但对于大肿瘤病例我们应意识到该风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验