• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精准激励和框架效应,以最小化晚期癌症患者认知偏差的影响。

Accuracy incentives and framing effects to minimize the influence of cognitive bias among advanced cancer patients.

机构信息

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

University of Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2022 Aug;27(9):2227-2235. doi: 10.1177/13591053211025601. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1177/13591053211025601
PMID:34187220
Abstract

Many patients with advanced illness have unrealistic survival expectations, largely due to cognitive biases. Studies suggests that when people are motivated to be accurate, they are less prone to succumb to these biases. Using a randomized survey design, we test whether offering advanced cancer patients ( = 200) incentives to estimate their prognosis improves accuracy. We also test whether presenting treatment benefits in terms of a loss (mortality) rather than a gain (survival) reduces willingness to take up a hypothetical treatment. Results are not consistent with the proposed hypotheses for either accuracy incentives or framing effects.

摘要

许多患有晚期疾病的患者对生存时间抱有不切实际的期望,这主要是由于认知偏差所致。研究表明,当人们有动机追求准确性时,他们就不太容易受到这些偏差的影响。我们采用随机调查设计,检验为晚期癌症患者(n=200)提供预后估计的激励措施是否会提高准确性。我们还检验了以损失(死亡率)而不是收益(存活率)来呈现治疗益处是否会降低接受假设治疗的意愿。结果与关于准确性激励或框架效应的假设都不一致。

相似文献

1
Accuracy incentives and framing effects to minimize the influence of cognitive bias among advanced cancer patients.精准激励和框架效应,以最小化晚期癌症患者认知偏差的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Aug;27(9):2227-2235. doi: 10.1177/13591053211025601. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Hope, bias and survival expectations of advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.晚期癌症患者的希望、偏见和生存预期:一项横断面研究。
Psychooncology. 2021 May;30(5):780-788. doi: 10.1002/pon.5675. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
The effect of framing on surrogate optimism bias: A simulation study.框架对替代乐观偏差的影响:一项模拟研究。
J Crit Care. 2016 Apr;32:85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
4
Great expectations of IVF patients: the role of gender, dispositional optimism and shared IVF prognoses.体外受精患者的期望:性别、性格乐观和共同的体外受精预测的作用。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac038.
5
Does the future look bright? Processing style determines the impact of valence weighting biases and self-beliefs on expectations.未来看起来光明吗?加工方式决定了价值权重偏差和自我信念对预期的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Feb;116(2):193-214. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000136. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Brief Report: Reduced Optimism Bias in Self-Referential Belief Updating in High-Functioning Autism.简要报告:高功能自闭症患者在自我参照信念更新中乐观偏差减少。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jul;49(7):2990-2998. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2940-0.
7
Losing Money and Motivation: Effects of Loss Incentives on Motivation and Metacognition in Younger and Older Adults.亏损与动机:损失激励对年轻人和老年人动机及元认知的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01489. eCollection 2020.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
9
Optimistic amnesia: how online and offline processing shape belief updating and memory biases in immediate and long-term optimism biases.乐观性遗忘:在线和离线加工如何塑造即时和长期乐观偏见中的信念更新和记忆偏差。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 4;16(5):453-462. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab011.
10
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment Tools to Examine Illness Understanding in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.用于评估晚期癌症患者疾病认知的评估工具:随机临床试验的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):385. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030385.
2
Debiasing Judgements Using a Distributed Cognition Approach: A Scoping Review of Technological Strategies.使用分布式认知方法消除判断偏差:技术策略的范围综述
Hum Factors. 2025 Jun;67(6):525-545. doi: 10.1177/00187208241292897. Epub 2024 Oct 26.