• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧颈丛阻滞用于颈椎前路手术:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的研究方案

Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Mulcahy Michael J, Elalingam Thananchayan, Jang Kevin, D'Souza Mario, Tait Matthew

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Nepean Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Macquarie Neurosurgery, Suite 201, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4
PMID:34187541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8244165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing focus to improve the quality of recovery following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Postoperative pain and nausea are the most common reasons for prolonged hospital stay and readmission after ACSS. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides site-specific analgesia with minimal side effects, thereby improving the quality of recovery. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect bilateral cervical plexus block has on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing ACSS.

METHODS

The study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, blinded, parallel-group, randomised placebo-controlled trial. 136 eligible patients (68 in each group) undergoing ACSS will be included. Patients randomised to the intervention group will have a SCPB administered under ultrasound guidance with a local anaesthetic solution (0.2% ropivacaine, 15mL); patients randomised to the placebo group will be injected in an identical manner with a saline solution. The primary outcome is the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire score at 24 h after surgery. In addition, comparisons between groups will be made for a 24-h opioid usage and length of hospital stay. Neck pain intensity will be quantified using the numeric rating scale at 1, 3, 6 and at 24 h postoperatively. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, dysphagia or hoarseness in the first 24 h after surgery will also be measured.

DISCUSSION

By conducting a blinded placebo trial, we aim to control for the bias inherently associated with a tangible medical intervention and show the true treatment effect of SCPB in ACSS. A statistically significant result will indicate an overall improved quality of recovery for patients; alternatively, if no benefit is shown, this trial will provide evidence that this intervention is unnecessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12619000028101. Prospectively registered on 11 January 2019 with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

摘要

背景

提高颈椎前路手术(ACSS)后恢复质量的关注度日益增加。术后疼痛和恶心是ACSS后住院时间延长和再次入院的最常见原因。颈浅丛阻滞(SCPB)提供部位特异性镇痛且副作用最小,从而提高恢复质量。我们研究的目的是调查双侧颈丛阻滞对接受ACSS患者术后恢复的影响。

方法

本研究是一项实用的、多中心、双盲、平行组、随机安慰剂对照试验。将纳入136例接受ACSS的符合条件患者(每组68例)。随机分配至干预组的患者将在超声引导下使用局部麻醉溶液(0.2%罗哌卡因,15mL)进行SCPB;随机分配至安慰剂组的患者将以相同方式注射生理盐水。主要结局是术后24小时的40项恢复质量问卷评分。此外,将对两组之间的24小时阿片类药物使用情况和住院时间进行比较。术后1、3、6和24小时将使用数字评分量表对颈部疼痛强度进行量化。还将测量术后24小时内恶心、呕吐、吞咽困难或声音嘶哑的发生率。

讨论

通过进行双盲安慰剂试验,我们旨在控制与切实的医学干预固有相关的偏倚,并显示SCPB在ACSS中的真实治疗效果。具有统计学意义的结果将表明患者的总体恢复质量得到改善;相反,如果未显示出益处,该试验将提供证据证明这种干预是不必要的。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12619000028101。于2019年1月11日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心进行前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0361/8244165/7bd1d89568ef/13063_2021_5377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0361/8244165/7bd1d89568ef/13063_2021_5377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0361/8244165/7bd1d89568ef/13063_2021_5377_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.双侧颈丛阻滞用于颈椎前路手术:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05377-4.
2
Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks enhance the quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroid cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial.超声引导下双侧颈浅丛阻滞可提高甲状腺癌手术患者的恢复质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109651. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109651. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Ultrasound guided bilateral cervical plexus block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following thyroid surgery.超声引导下双侧颈丛阻滞可减少甲状腺手术后的阿片类药物用量。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Oct;29(5):579-84. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9635-x. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
4
Effect of superficial cervical plexus block on postoperative quality of recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial.颈浅丛阻滞对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;62(8):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0382-3. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
The bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with 0.75% ropivacaine administered before or after surgery does not prevent postoperative pain after total thyroidectomy.术前或术后使用0.75%罗哌卡因进行双侧颈浅丛阻滞不能预防甲状腺全切除术后的疼痛。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.008.
6
Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block enhances pain relief and quality of recovery after breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial.超声引导下的锯肌平面阻滞可增强乳腺癌手术后的止痛效果和恢复质量:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;36(6):436-441. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001004.
7
Efficacy of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block for quality of recovery in posterior thoraco-lumbar spinal decompression surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞对胸腰段脊柱后路减压手术恢复质量的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Feb 17;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05101-2.
8
The superficial cervical plexus block for postoperative pain therapy in carotid artery surgery. A prospective randomised controlled trial.颈浅丛阻滞用于颈动脉手术术后疼痛治疗:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.06.024. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
9
Single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery: a prospective randomized comparative trial.超声引导下颈浅筋膜阻滞联合臂丛神经阻滞在锁骨手术中的单次注射技术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02333-4.
10
Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block in the Management of Persistent Postoperative Pain Post Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.颈丛神经阻滞在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后持续性术后疼痛管理中的应用:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、临床试验。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jun;23(3):237-244.

引用本文的文献

1
Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Occipital Craniotomies: A Narrative Review.枕下开颅术后疼痛管理的颈浅丛阻滞:一项叙述性综述
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(3):101. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030101.

本文引用的文献

1
Analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block for thyroid surgery: meta-analysis and systematic review.双侧颈浅丛神经阻滞在甲状腺手术中的镇痛效果:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.083. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block is more effective than landmark technique for reducing pain from thyroidectomy.超声引导下双侧颈浅丛阻滞在减轻甲状腺切除术后疼痛方面比体表定位技术更有效。
J Pain Res. 2017 Jul 14;10:1619-1622. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S138222. eCollection 2017.
3
Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion is Associated With Fewer Short-term Complications in One- and Two-level Cases: A Propensity-adjusted Analysis.
门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术在单节段和双节段病例中短期并发症较少:一项倾向调整分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42(14):1044-1049. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001988.
4
Cervical plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A randomized clinical trial.颈前路椎间盘切除融合手术中颈丛麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:一项随机临床试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e6119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006119.
5
Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines.手术的随机安慰剂对照试验:伦理分析与指南
J Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;42(12):776-783. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103333. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Best Practices for Outpatient Anterior Cervical Surgery: Results From a Delphi Panel.门诊前路颈椎手术的最佳实践:德尔菲专家组的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jun 1;42(11):E648-E659. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001925.
7
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales.三种恢复质量量表的最小临床重要差异
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
8
Feasibility of surgical randomised controlled trials with a placebo arm: a systematic review.带有安慰剂组的外科随机对照试验的可行性:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 15;6(3):e010194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010194.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
10
Clinically Important Difference in Quality of Recovery Scores.恢复质量评分中的临床重要差异。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):13-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001060.