Box Erin K, Cleveland Christopher A, Garrett Kayla B, Grunert Ryan K, Hutchins Katherine, Majewska Ania A, Thompson Alec T, Wyckoff Seth T, Ehlers Coles, Yabsley Michael J
Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, Department of Population Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, 30602, GA, USA.
Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, 30602, GA, USA.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2021 Jun 8;15:231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.06.001. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Parasitic nematodes in the genus have a complex life cycle that requires more than one host species in both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The most well-studied species, , is the causative agent of human Guinea worm disease (dracunculiasis). There are several other species that infect non-human animals, primarily wildlife (reptiles and mammals). The classic route of transmission to humans is through the ingestion of water containing the intermediate host, a cyclopoid copepod, infected with third-stage larvae (L3s). However, many animal hosts (e.g., terrestrial snakes, dogs) of other sp. appear unlikely to ingest a large number of copepods while drinking. Therefore, alternative routes of infection (e.g., paratenic or transport hosts) may facilitate transmission to these species. To better understand the role of paratenic and transport hosts in transmission to animal definitive hosts, we compared copepod ingestion rates for aquatic species (fish, frogs [tadpoles and adults], and newts) which may serve as paratenic or transport hosts. We hypothesized that fish would consume more copepods than amphibians. Our findings confirm that African clawed frogs () and fish consume copepods, but that fish ingest, on average, significantly higher numbers (68% [34/50]) than adult African clawed frogs (36% [18/50]) during a 24-h time period. Our results suggest that amphibians and fish may play a role in the transmission of to definitive hosts. Still, additional research is required to determine whether, in the wild, fish or frogs are serving as paratenic or transport hosts. If so, they may facilitate transmission. However, if these animals simply act as dead-end hosts or as means of copepod population control, they may decrease transmission.
属的寄生线虫具有复杂的生命周期,在水生和陆地栖息地都需要不止一种宿主物种。研究最充分的物种——麦地那龙线虫,是人类几内亚龙线虫病(麦地那龙线虫病)的病原体。还有其他几种麦地那龙线虫物种感染非人类动物,主要是野生动物(爬行动物和哺乳动物)。麦地那龙线虫传播给人类的经典途径是摄入含有中间宿主——感染了三期幼虫(L3s)的剑水蚤类桡足动物的水。然而,其他麦地那龙线虫物种的许多动物宿主(如陆生蛇、狗)在饮水时似乎不太可能摄入大量桡足动物。因此,替代感染途径(如转续宿主或运输宿主)可能有助于将麦地那龙线虫传播给这些物种。为了更好地理解转续宿主和运输宿主在麦地那龙线虫传播给动物终宿主中的作用,我们比较了可能作为转续宿主或运输宿主的水生物种(鱼类、青蛙[蝌蚪和成蛙]以及蝾螈)的桡足动物摄食率。我们假设鱼类比两栖动物消耗更多的桡足动物。我们的研究结果证实,非洲爪蟾和鱼类会摄食桡足动物,但在24小时时间段内,鱼类平均摄入的数量(68%[34/50])明显高于成年非洲爪蟾(36%[18/50])。我们的结果表明,两栖动物和鱼类可能在麦地那龙线虫传播给终宿主的过程中发挥作用。不过,仍需要进一步研究来确定在野外鱼类或青蛙是否作为转续宿主或运输宿主。如果是这样,它们可能有助于麦地那龙线虫的传播。然而,如果这些动物仅仅作为终末宿主或作为桡足动物种群控制的手段,它们可能会减少麦地那龙线虫的传播。