6 种隔物灸治疗中国痛经患者的疗效和痛经评分比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy and dysmenorrhea score of 6 object-separated moxibustions for the treatment of Chinese patients with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine.

Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510009, Guangdong.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2;100(26):e26185. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026185.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD), one of the most common diseases in women, is known to be effective with object-separated moxibustion. However, because there is no large sample size for comparison, it is difficult to choose the best method for the clinical treatment of these different treatments. Therefore, our aim was to compare and rank different moxibustion methods to determine the most effective treatment method for PD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature, to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the object-separated moxibustion is associated with dysmenorrhea, as well as we also manually checked the bibliographies of eligible studies and topic-related reviews, RCTs from their inception to May 1, 2020. Three investigators read the citations and excluded quasi-randomized trials and trials that were incomplete. We extracted data following a predefined hierarchy. We assessed the studies' risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The primary outcomes were efficacy (response rate) and dysmenorrhea scores. We estimated the summary odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) using pairwise and network meta-analyses with random effects. STATA software version 16.0, ADDIS software version 1.16.5, and R software version 3.6.1 were used to statistically analyze all data.

RESULTS

Fifty-six RCTs with 5550 patients were included, comparing 6 object-separated moxibustion therapies with acupuncture or oral medicine. All moxibustions were more effective than ibuprofen, with OR ranging between 6.75 (95%CI: 3.58 to 13.22) for moxibustion at the navel. For relieving pain which uses dysmenorrhea score to evaluate, mild moxibustion (MD = -1.42, -4.24 to 0.85) was more effective than others. A total of 24 (42.8%) of 56 trials were rated as having a high risk of bias, 31(55.4%) as moderate, and 1(1.8%) as low, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild moxibustion cannot only effectively treat PD but also relieve pain in comparison with ibuprofen. Although GRADE evidence indicate low to moderate for most comparisons, mild moxibustion seems to be an advisable option for PD treatment to relieve symptoms.

摘要

背景

原发性痛经(PD)是女性最常见的疾病之一,经穴隔物灸疗效确切。但由于缺乏大样本量的比较,难以选择这些不同治疗方法的最佳临床治疗方法。因此,我们的目的是比较和排序不同的艾灸方法,以确定 PD 的最有效治疗方法。

材料和方法

系统检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、中国知识基础设施、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献,以确定与痛经相关的隔物灸随机对照试验(RCT),并手动检查了合格研究的参考文献和主题相关综述,从 RCT 开始到 2020 年 5 月 1 日。三名研究者阅读了引文,并排除了准随机试验和不完整的试验。我们按照预先确定的层次结构提取数据。我们根据 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册和使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)框架的证据确定性来评估研究的偏倚风险。主要结局是疗效(反应率)和痛经评分。我们使用具有随机效应的成对和网络荟萃分析来估计汇总优势比(OR)和均数差(MD)。STATA 软件版本 16.0、ADDIS 软件版本 1.16.5 和 R 软件版本 3.6.1 用于对所有数据进行统计学分析。

结果

共纳入 56 项 RCT,涉及 5550 例患者,比较了 6 种隔物灸疗法与针灸或口服药物的疗效。与布洛芬相比,所有艾灸均更有效,OR 范围为脐灸 6.75(95%CI:3.58 至 13.22)。对于使用痛经评分评估疼痛缓解的情况,轻度艾灸(MD=-1.42,-4.24 至 0.85)比其他方法更有效。56 项试验中有 24 项(42.8%)被评为高偏倚风险,31 项(55.4%)为中度偏倚,1 项(1.8%)为低偏倚,证据确定性为中度。

结论

与布洛芬相比,轻度艾灸不仅能有效治疗 PD,还能缓解疼痛。尽管 GRADE 证据表明大多数比较的证据质量为低至中度,但轻度艾灸似乎是治疗 PD 以缓解症状的一种可行选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5117/8257912/7dee5c014d49/medi-100-e26185-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索