Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20/6D, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Aug;133(15-16):762-769. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01899-8. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Although coronary angiography (CAG) should be performed also in the absence of ST-elevation (STE) after sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), this recommendation is not well implemented in daily routine.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted in a tertiary care center between January 2005 and December 2014. We included all SCA patients aged ≥ 18 years with presumed cardiac cause and sustained ROSC in the absence of STE at hospital admission. The rate and timing of CAG were defined as the primary endpoints. As secondary endpoints, the reasons pro and contra CAG were analyzed. Furthermore, we observed if the signs and symptoms used for decision making occurred more often in patients with treatable CAD.
We included 645 (53.6%) of the 1203 screened patients, CAG was performed in 343 (53.2%) patients with a diagnosis of occlusive CAD in 214 (62.4%) patients. Of these, 151 (71.0%) patients had occlusive CAD treated with coronary intervention, thrombus aspiration, or coronary artery bypass grafting. In an adjusted binomial logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 70 years, female sex, non-shockable rhythms, and cardiomyopathy were associated with withholding of CAG. In patients diagnosed and treated with occlusive CAD, initially shockable rhythms, previously diagnosed CAD, hypertension, and smoking were found more often.
Although selection bias is unavoidable due to the retrospective design of this study, a high proportion of the examined patients had occlusive CAD. The criteria used for patient selection may be suboptimal.
冠心病(CAD)是心搏骤停(SCA)最常见的原因。尽管在持续自主循环恢复(ROSC)后没有 ST 段抬高(STE)的情况下也应进行冠状动脉造影(CAG),但这一建议在日常实践中并未得到很好的执行。
在 2005 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间,在一家三级护理中心进行了回顾性数据库分析。我们纳入了所有年龄≥18 岁、有假定心源性病因和持续 ROSC 且入院时无 STE 的 SCA 患者。CAG 的频率和时间被定义为主要终点。作为次要终点,分析了赞成和反对 CAG 的原因。此外,我们观察了用于决策的症状和体征是否更常见于可治疗 CAD 的患者。
我们纳入了 1203 名筛查患者中的 645 名(53.6%),343 名(53.2%)患者进行了 CAG,其中 214 名(62.4%)患者有阻塞性 CAD。在这些患者中,151 名(71.0%)患者接受了冠状动脉介入治疗、血栓抽吸或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗阻塞性 CAD。在调整后的二项逻辑回归分析中,年龄≥70 岁、女性、非电击性节律和心肌病与不进行 CAG 相关。在诊断和治疗为阻塞性 CAD 的患者中,最初的电击性节律、先前诊断的 CAD、高血压和吸烟更为常见。
尽管由于本研究的回顾性设计不可避免存在选择偏倚,但检查的患者中有很大一部分患有阻塞性 CAD。用于患者选择的标准可能并不理想。