Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Resuscitation Science, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Reading Hospital, Reading, Pennsylvania.
J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;64(4):439-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
There is broad consensus that resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should receive immediate coronary angiography (CAG); however, factors that guide patient selection and optimal timing of CAG for post-arrest patients without evidence of STEMI remain incompletely described.
We sought to describe the timing of post-arrest CAG in actual practice, patient characteristics associated with decision to perform immediate vs. delayed CAG, and patient outcomes after CAG.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study at seven U.S. academic hospitals. Resuscitated adult patients with OHCA were included if they presented between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 and received CAG during hospitalization. Emergency medical services run sheets and hospital records were analyzed. Patients without evidence of STEMI were grouped and compared based on time from arrival to CAG performance into "early" (≤ 6 h) and "delayed" (> 6 h).
Two hundred twenty-one patients were included. Median time to CAG was 18.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-94.6 h). Early catheterization was performed on 94 patients (42.5%) and delayed catheterization was performed on 127 patients (57.5%). Patients in the early group were older (61 years [IQR 55-70 years] vs. 57 years [IQR 47-65] years) and more likely to be male (79.8% vs. 59.8%). Those in the early group were more likely to have clinically significant lesions (58.5% vs. 39.4%) and receive revascularization (41.5% vs. 19.7%). Patients were more likely to die in the early group (47.9% vs. 33.1%). Among survivors, there was no significant difference in neurologic recovery at discharge.
OHCA patients without evidence of STEMI who received early CAG were older and more likely to be male. This group was more likely to have intervenable lesions and receive revascularization.
人们广泛认为,复苏后的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)伴有 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的患者应立即接受冠状动脉造影(CAG);然而,对于没有 STEMI 证据的心脏骤停后患者,指导患者选择和 CAG 最佳时机的因素仍描述不完全。
我们旨在描述实际实践中心脏骤停后 CAG 的时间,以及与立即进行与延迟进行 CAG 决策相关的患者特征,并描述 CAG 后的患者结局。
我们在美国七家学术医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 OHCA 复苏的成年患者,如果他们在住院期间接受 CAG,则将其纳入研究。对紧急医疗服务运行表和医院记录进行分析。根据从到达至 CAG 实施的时间,将没有 STEMI 证据的患者分为“早期”(≤ 6 h)和“延迟”(> 6 h)两组,并进行比较。
共纳入 221 例患者。CAG 的中位时间为 18.6 小时(四分位距 [IQR] 1.5-94.6 小时)。94 例(42.5%)患者行早期导管插入术,127 例(57.5%)患者行延迟导管插入术。早期组患者年龄较大(61 岁 [IQR 55-70 岁] vs. 57 岁 [IQR 47-65 岁]),更可能为男性(79.8% vs. 59.8%)。早期组更可能存在有临床意义的病变(58.5% vs. 39.4%),并接受血运重建治疗(41.5% vs. 19.7%)。早期组患者更有可能死亡(47.9% vs. 33.1%)。在幸存者中,出院时神经恢复没有显著差异。
没有 STEMI 证据的 OHCA 患者,如果接受早期 CAG,年龄较大,更可能为男性。这组患者更有可能存在可干预的病变并接受血运重建治疗。