Marsh Kassandra, Decano Arnold, Siegfried Justin, Ahmed Nabeela, Blum Sharon, Tirmizi Samad, Dong Mei Qin, Mehta Dhara, Pham Vinh P, Papadopoulos John, Dubrovskaya Yanina
Tisch Hospital Department of Pharmacy.
Brooklyn Hospital Department of Pharmacy.
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2021 Mar;29(2):e88-e96. doi: 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000982. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
As New York became the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic early on, clinicians were challenged to provide optimal medical and pharmaceutical care, despite the paucity of supporting literature and guidance. We sought to describe prescribing patterns and outcomes of physician response to the urgent need to treat COVID-19 patients before initiation of randomized clinical trials.
This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 initially admitted to acute care services during March 2020. Critically ill patients requiring intensive care unit level of care on admission were excluded.
A total of 639 consecutive patients (supportive care, n = 247; treatment n = 392) were included in the analysis. Overall, the 28-day mortality rate was 12.2%. The mortality was 8.7% higher in the treatment group (15.6% vs 6.9% in the supportive care group, < 0.001). Treatment was not protective against progression to severe disease (18.4% vs 3.6% with supportive care, < 0.0001). Time to defervescence, duration of oxygen support, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were also higher in the treatment group. In multivariate analysis, 60 years or older, presence of severe disease, and need for ICU admission were identified as independent predictors of 28-day mortality. There were 41 (10.5%) adverse event in the treatment group, with the majority being QT prolongation and gastrointestinal effects.
In this cohort of hospitalized patients admitted to acute care services, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir or both could not be shown to improve mortality, progression to severe disease, or clinical response.
随着纽约在疫情早期成为新冠疫情的震中,临床医生面临着提供最佳医疗和药物治疗的挑战,尽管相关支持文献和指南匮乏。我们试图描述在随机临床试验启动之前,医生对治疗新冠患者迫切需求的处方模式及结果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2020年3月最初入住急症护理服务的成年新冠患者。入院时需要重症监护病房护理水平的重症患者被排除。
共有639例连续患者(支持治疗组,n = 247;治疗组,n = 392)纳入分析。总体而言,28天死亡率为12.2%。治疗组死亡率高出8.7%(支持治疗组为6.9%,治疗组为15.6%,<0.001)。治疗并不能预防疾病进展为重症(支持治疗组为3.6%,治疗组为18.4%,<0.0001)。治疗组的退热时间、吸氧时间、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间也更长。多因素分析显示,60岁及以上、存在重症以及需要入住ICU是28天死亡率的独立预测因素。治疗组有41例(10.5%)不良事件,多数为QT间期延长和胃肠道反应。
在这组入住急症护理服务的住院患者中,未显示羟氯喹、洛匹那韦/利托那韦或两者联合治疗能改善死亡率、疾病进展为重症或临床反应。