Karacop E, Enhos A, Bakhshaliyev N, Ozdemir R
Bezmialem Foundation University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2021 May 29;2021:8876704. doi: 10.1155/2021/8876704. eCollection 2021.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. Identification of patients at risk for developing AF and the opportunity for early targeted intervention might have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Prolonged P wave duration and decreased P wave voltage have been shown to be independent predictors of AF. The present study aimed to investigate the role of P wave duration/P wave voltage in predicting new-onset AF.
We screened a total of 640 consecutive patients who admitted to cardiology outpatient clinic with a complaint of palpitation between 2012 and 2014. 24-h Holter monitoring, echocardiography, and electrocardiography (ECG) recordings were reviewed to identify new-onset AF. Patients were assigned into two groups based on presence ( = 150) and absence ( = 490) of new-onset AF. Previous ECGs with sinus rhythm were analyzed. P wave duration was measured in inferior leads, and P wave voltage was measured in lead one. P wave duration/P wave voltage was also calculated for each patient.
One hundred fifty subjects (23.4%) had new-onset AF among 640 patients. P wave duration (123.27 ± 12.87 vs. 119.33 ± 17.39 ms, =0.024) and P wave duration/P wave voltage (1284.70 ± 508.03 vs. 924.14 ± 462.06 ms/mV, < 0.001) were higher, and P wave voltage (0.12 ± 0.04 vs. 0.13 ± 0.04 mV, < 0.001) was significantly lower in the new-onset AF group compared with non-AFs. P wave duration/P wave voltage, with a cut off of 854.5 ms/mV, had 83.3% sensitivity and 62.0% specificity in a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC 0.728, 95% CI 0.687-0.769; < 0.001). Their negative and positive predictive values were 78.7% and 68.6%, respectively. In a univariate regression analysis, age, smoking, C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, left atrial diameter, left atrial volume index, P wave duration, P wave voltage, and P wave duration/P wave voltage were significantly associated with the development of new-onset AF. Moreover, smoking (OR 4.008, 95% CI 1.707-9.409; =0.001), left atrial volume index (OR 7.108, 95% CI 4.400-11.483; < 0.001), and P wave duration/P wave voltage (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.000-1.003; =0.044) were found to be significant independent predictors of new-onset AF in a multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other risk parameters.
The P wave duration/P wave voltage ratio is a practical, easy-to-use, cheap, and reliable electrocardiographic parameter, which can play a promising role for both in predicting and elucidating a mechanism of new-onset AF.
心房颤动(AF)是临床实践中最常见的持续性心律失常。识别有发生AF风险的患者以及早期进行靶向干预的机会,可能对发病率和死亡率产生重大影响。P波时限延长和P波电压降低已被证明是AF的独立预测因素。本研究旨在探讨P波时限/P波电压在预测新发AF中的作用。
我们筛选了2012年至2014年间因心悸主诉入住心内科门诊的640例连续患者。回顾24小时动态心电图监测、超声心动图和心电图(ECG)记录以识别新发AF。根据是否存在新发AF(n = 150)将患者分为两组,对既往窦性心律的心电图进行分析。在下壁导联测量P波时限,在I导联测量P波电压。还计算了每位患者的P波时限/P波电压。
640例患者中有150例(23.4%)发生新发AF。与非AF组相比,新发AF组的P波时限(123.27±12.87 vs. 119.33±17.39 ms,P = 0.024)和P波时限/P波电压(1284.70±508.03 vs. 924.14±462.06 ms/mV,P < 0.001)更高,而P波电压(0.12±0.04 vs. 0.13±0.04 mV,P < 0.001)显著更低。在受试者工作特征曲线中,P波时限/P波电压的截断值为854.5 ms/mV,敏感性为83.3%,特异性为62.0%(曲线下面积0.728,95%可信区间0.687 - 0.769;P < 0.001)。其阴性和阳性预测值分别为78.7%和68.6%。在单因素回归分析中,年龄、吸烟、C反应蛋白、脑钠肽、左心房直径、左心房容积指数、P波时限、P波电压和P波时限/P波电压与新发AF的发生显著相关。此外,在多因素分析中,调整其他风险参数后,吸烟(比值比4.008,95%可信区间1.707 - 9.409;P = 0.001)、左心房容积指数(比值比7.108,95%可信区间4.400 - 11.483;P < 0.001)和P波时限/P波电压(比值比1.002,95%可信区间1.000 - 1.003;P = 0.044)被发现是新发AF的显著独立预测因素。
P波时限/P波电压比值是一个实用、易用、廉价且可靠的心电图参数,在预测和阐明新发AF的机制方面可能发挥重要作用。