Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩袖修复术中的前束撕裂

Anterior Cable Tears in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.

作者信息

Roache Paul B

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr 5;3(3):e695-e705. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.007. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether anterior cable tears could be identified at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and determine the characteristics of the anterior cable tears identified.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2017 all shoulder arthroscopies had data collected prospectively at the time of surgery, specifically including injury to the capsular and tendon zones of insertion on the greater tuberosity. Anterior cable position and degree of injury and medialization were recorded, as well as complete findings of the diagnostic arthroscopy. The inclusion criterion was primary shoulder arthroscopy. The exclusion criterion was any revision shoulder arthroscopy. All arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (ARCR) were grouped together and all other nonarthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgeries (non-ARCR) were grouped together.

RESULTS

In total, 118 shoulder arthroscopies had data collected prospectively at the time of surgery: 90 primary shoulder arthroscopies met the inclusion criteria; 28 were excluded because they were revision surgeries. There were 42 patients in the ARCR group (Group 1). Six of these were partial tears, and 36 were full-thickness tears. There were 48 patients in the non-ARCR group (Group 2). The non-ARCR Group 2 served as an anatomic baseline for ARCR Group 1. In all 90 shoulders, the rotator cable and anterior cable were identified. Group 1 (ARCR) incidence of anterior cable tears with abnormal position was 71.4% compared to 2.1% in group 2 (non-ARCR) ( < .001) Group 1 (ARCR) incidence of anterior cable tears with normal anterior cable position (n = 12) was compared to abnormal anterior cable position (n = 30). Injury to the anterior footprint capsular and tendon zones were compared. Normal anterior cable position correlated with no or low-grade injury to anterior footprint capsular zone. (Nimura zone C1). Abnormal anterior cable displacement graded as moderate (n = 20) and severe (n = 10) were compared for injury to the anterior footprint. Moderate displacement correlated with complete or high grade injury to C1 in 85% and complete injury to R1 in 45% ( < .001 and .049). In severe displacement complete C1 injury was 100%, and complete R1 injury was 100% ( < .001 and .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior cable tears are universally identified in ARCR. Three patterns of medial displacement severity correlated with injury to a crucial insertion zone (C1) at the anterior footprint. The degree of anterior cable disruption at the anterior footprint and displacement was commonly disproportionately greater than the injury to the supraspinatus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

摘要

目的

确定在关节镜下肩袖修复时能否识别前束撕裂,并确定所识别出的前束撕裂的特征。

方法

2016年至2017年期间,所有肩关节镜检查均在手术时前瞻性收集数据,具体包括大结节处关节囊和肌腱附着区的损伤情况。记录前束的位置、损伤程度和内移情况,以及诊断性关节镜检查的完整结果。纳入标准为初次肩关节镜检查。排除标准为任何翻修肩关节镜检查。所有关节镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)归为一组,所有其他非关节镜下肩袖修复手术(非ARCR)归为一组。

结果

共有118例肩关节镜检查在手术时前瞻性收集了数据:90例初次肩关节镜检查符合纳入标准;28例因是翻修手术而被排除。ARCR组(第1组)有42例患者。其中6例为部分撕裂,36例为全层撕裂。非ARCR组(第2组)有48例患者。第2组非ARCR作为第1组ARCR的解剖学基线。在所有90例肩部中,均识别出了旋转束和前束。第1组(ARCR)前束位置异常的撕裂发生率为71.4%,而第2组(非ARCR)为2.1%(P<0.001)。将第1组(ARCR)前束位置正常(n = 12)的前束撕裂发生率与前束位置异常(n = 30)的进行比较。比较前足印关节囊和肌腱区的损伤情况。前束位置正常与前足印关节囊区无损伤或轻度损伤相关(Nimura区C1)。将前束异常内移分为中度(n = 20)和重度(n = 10),比较其对前足印的损伤情况。中度移位与C1区完全或高度损伤的相关性为85%,与R1区完全损伤的相关性为45%(P<0.001和0.049)。在重度移位中,C1区完全损伤为100%,R1区完全损伤为100%(P<0.001和0.001)。

结论

在ARCR中普遍可识别出前束撕裂。三种内移严重程度模式与前足印关键附着区(C1)的损伤相关。前足印处前束的破坏程度和移位通常比冈上肌的损伤大得多。

证据水平

III级,诊断性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a09/8220606/e4397b17829d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验