• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层肩袖撕裂修复结局相关的形态学因素:一项至少 2 年的回顾性对比研究。

Morphologic Factors Related to Repair Outcomes for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Minimum 2-Year Retrospective Comparison Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.040
PMID:30522802
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical outcomes and repair integrity after en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears and to analyze the morphologic factors related to clinical outcomes and repair integrity.

METHODS

This study included 99 patients who underwent the technique of en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears. Morphologic factors were estimated using magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and Constant shoulder score. The morphologic factors included the shape of delamination, retraction length of the bursal and articular layers, gap distance between the layers, and length of the intrasubstance cleavage. According to follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, cases were categorized into the intact or retear group. The morphologic factors were compared between the 2 groups, including the correlation between the morphologic factors and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Retears occurred in 26 of 99 cases (26%). In both the intact and retear groups, the University of California, Los Angeles, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant scores improved postoperatively (P < .0001). The most common delamination shape was that of a more retracted articular layer in retears. We found no differences in retears in terms of the retraction length of the bursal layer, gap distance, and length of the intrasubstance cleavage. However, the retraction length of the articular layer differed significantly between the groups (P < .0001). No correlation between the morphologic factors and clinical outcomes was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair is a useful technique in delaminated tears to achieve optimal repair outcomes. In addition, although there was no correlation between the morphologic factors and postoperative clinical outcomes, the retraction length of the articular layer was identified as a significant factor influencing repair integrity. We recommend emphasizing the reduction of tension within the articular layer during the repair procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparison study.

摘要

目的

评估整体经骨等效缝线桥修复术治疗层裂性肩袖撕裂的临床效果和修复完整性,并分析与临床效果和修复完整性相关的形态学因素。

方法

本研究纳入 99 例行整体经骨等效缝线桥修复术治疗层裂性肩袖撕裂的患者。使用磁共振成像评估形态学因素,采用加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校评分、美国肩肘外科协会评分和 Constant 评分评估临床效果。形态学因素包括撕裂的形状、肩袖和关节层的回缩长度、层间间隙距离以及实质内撕裂的长度。根据随访磁共振成像,将病例分为完整或再撕裂组。比较两组间的形态学因素,包括形态学因素与术后结果的相关性。

结果

99 例中共有 26 例(26%)发生再撕裂。在完整组和再撕裂组中,加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校评分、美国肩肘外科协会评分和 Constant 评分在术后均得到改善(P<0.0001)。再撕裂中最常见的撕裂形状是关节层回缩更为明显。我们发现肩袖层的回缩长度、间隙距离和实质内撕裂的长度在再撕裂中无差异。然而,两组间关节层的回缩长度差异显著(P<0.0001)。形态学因素与临床结果之间无相关性。

结论

关节镜下整体经骨等效缝线桥修复术是治疗层裂性肩袖撕裂的一种有效技术,可获得理想的修复效果。此外,尽管形态学因素与术后临床结果之间无相关性,但关节层的回缩长度被确定为影响修复完整性的重要因素。我们建议在修复过程中强调减少关节层的张力。

证据等级

III 级,回顾性比较研究。

相似文献

1
Morphologic Factors Related to Repair Outcomes for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Minimum 2-Year Retrospective Comparison Study.分层肩袖撕裂修复结局相关的形态学因素:一项至少 2 年的回顾性对比研究。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Comparison of Structural Integrity and Functional Outcome Between Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears After En Masse Arthroscopic Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.全关节镜修复后层裂与非层裂肩袖撕裂的结构完整性和功能结果比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1411-1419. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838257.
3
Surgical Results of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Repair Using Suture-Bridge Technique With All-Layers or Bursal Layer-Only Repair.使用缝线桥技术进行分层肩袖修复的手术结果:全层或仅滑膜层修复
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):468-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546515615573. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears Showed Lower Short-term Retear Rates After Arthroscopic Double-Layer Repair Versus Bursal Layer-Only Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.关节镜下双层修复与单纯滑囊层修复治疗肩袖分层撕裂的短期再撕裂率比较:一项随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):689-696. doi: 10.1177/0363546519897033. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic en bloc repair for delaminated rotator cuff tear versus non-delaminated tear.关节镜下整块修复分层与非分层肩袖撕裂的临床和影像学结果。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499018821771. doi: 10.1177/2309499018821771.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Modified suture-bridge technique to prevent a marginal dog-ear deformity improves structural integrity after rotator cuff repair.改良缝线桥技术预防边缘“狗耳”畸形可改善肩袖修复后的结构完整性。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):597-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562175. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
8
Conventional En Masse Repair Versus Separate Double-Layer Double-Row Repair for the Treatment of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.传统整块修复与分层双排修复治疗分层肩袖撕裂的对比
Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1146-52. doi: 10.1177/0363546516628869. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
Comparison of En Masse Versus Dual-Layer Suture Bridge Procedures for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.全层缝合与双层缝合桥技术治疗肩袖部分撕裂的对比研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3150-3156. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.054. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复后修复完整性和功能结果:双排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
L-shaped morphology is a key risk factor for delamination in degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears.L形形态是退行性全层肩袖撕裂分层的关键危险因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2626-2632. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12640. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Clinical analysis of arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen suture in the repair of delaminated rotator cuff tears.关节镜下改良梅森-艾伦缝合法修复分层肩袖撕裂的临床分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 13;26(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08262-8.
3
A Modified Arthroscopic Triple-row Repair Technique for L-shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.
改良关节镜下三排修复技术治疗 L 型层裂肩袖撕裂
Orthop Surg. 2024 May;16(5):1117-1126. doi: 10.1111/os.14039. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Outcomes After Double-Layer Repair Versus En Masse Repair for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.分层肩袖损伤双层修复与整块修复后的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Oct 19;11(10):23259671231206183. doi: 10.1177/23259671231206183. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
[Effectiveness of arthroscopic "hybrid" suture for delaminated rotator cuff tear: A prospective randomized controlled study].关节镜下“混合”缝合治疗分层性肩袖撕裂的有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 15;37(4):398-403. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202301034.
6
Delaminated Tears of the Rotator Cuff: MRI Interpretation with Clinical Correlation.肩袖分层撕裂:MRI解读与临床关联
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1133. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061133.
7
Anterior Cable Tears in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.关节镜下肩袖修复术中的前束撕裂
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr 5;3(3):e695-e705. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.007. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Relationship of the Shape of Subacromial Spur and Rotator Cuff Partial Thickness Tear.肩峰下骨赘形态与肩袖部分厚度撕裂的关系。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2019 Sep 1;22(3):139-145. doi: 10.5397/cise.2019.22.3.139. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Augmented Repair of Large to Massive Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears With Autologous Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Graft: The Arthroscopic "Cuff-Plus" Technique.使用自体肱二头肌长头肌腱移植对大至巨大分层性肩袖撕裂进行增强修复:关节镜下“肩袖加”技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):e1683-e1688. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.07.011. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Restoration of supraspinatus and infraspinatus deep plane occupation ratios was greater in delaminated tears than in non-delaminated tears after rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复术后,分层撕裂患者的冈上肌和冈下肌深层平面占有率恢复情况比非分层撕裂患者更好。
J Orthop. 2020 Jan 10;20:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.006. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.