• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺导管原位癌的时间趋势:临床、放射学和病理学观点。

Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8699-8709. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3
PMID:34196861
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because no prior studies have evaluated the chronological trends of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) despite the increasing number of surgeries performed for DCIS, this study analyzed how the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics of DCIS changed during a 10-year period.

METHODS

Of 7123 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at a single institution from 2006 to 2015, 792 patients with pure DCIS were included in this study. The chronological trends of age, symptoms, method for detecting either mammography or ultrasonography, tumor size, nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and molecular markers were calculated using Poisson regression for all patients and asymptomatic patients.

RESULTS

During 10 years, DCIS surgery rates significantly increased (p < 0.001). Despite the high percentage of DCIS detected on mammography, the detection rate for DCIS by mammography significantly decreased (97.3% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2015; p = 0.025), whereas the detection rate by ultrasound significantly increased (2.7% to 31.0%; p < 0.001). Conservation surgery rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.058), low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates (OR, 1.069), and the absence of comedonecrosis (OR, 1.104) significantly increased over time (all p < 0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR, 0.935) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity rates (OR, 0.953) significantly decreased (all p < 0.05). The same trends were observed for the 613 asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSION

The rate of DCIS detected on ultrasound only significantly increased during 10 years. Low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates significantly increased, whereas ER negativity and HER2 positivity rates significantly decreased during the same period. These findings suggest that DCIS detected on screening ultrasound is less aggressive than DCIS detected on mammography.

摘要

背景

尽管因导管原位癌(DCIS)而行的手术数量不断增加,但此前尚无研究评估其时间趋势。因此,本研究分析了 10 年间 DCIS 的临床、影像学和病理学特征的变化。

方法

本研究纳入了 2006 年至 2015 年期间在一家医疗机构行原发性乳腺癌手术的 7123 例患者,其中 792 例为单纯 DCIS 患者。采用泊松回归分析了所有患者和无症状患者的年龄、症状、乳腺钼靶或超声检测方法、肿瘤大小、核分级、粉刺样坏死和分子标志物的时间趋势。

结果

10 年间,DCIS 手术比例显著增加(p<0.001)。尽管乳腺钼靶检出的 DCIS 比例较高,但乳腺钼靶检出 DCIS 的比例显著降低(2006 年为 97.3%,2015 年为 67.6%;p=0.025),而超声检出比例显著升高(2.7%升至 31.0%;p<0.001)。保乳手术比例(比值比 [OR],1.058)、低-中核分级比例(OR,1.069)和无粉刺样坏死(OR,1.104)随时间推移呈上升趋势(均 p<0.05)。雌激素受体(ER)阴性(OR,0.935)和人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性比例(OR,0.953)显著降低(均 p<0.05)。在 613 例无症状患者中也观察到了相同的趋势。

结论

10 年间仅通过超声检出的 DCIS 比例显著增加。低-中核分级比例显著升高,而同期 ER 阴性和 HER2 阳性比例显著降低。这些发现提示,筛查超声检出的 DCIS 比乳腺钼靶检出的 DCIS 侵袭性更低。

相似文献

1
Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.乳腺导管原位癌的时间趋势:临床、放射学和病理学观点。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8699-8709. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影与超声检测到的导管原位癌的长期监测:与第二乳腺癌相关的因素。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):37-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181844. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes.乳腺钼靶筛查发现的导管原位癌:基于乳腺癌亚型的钼靶特征
Clin Imaging. 2015 Nov-Dec;39(6):983-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
4
Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.仅在无症状患者中,比较乳腺钼靶与超声检查发现的导管原位癌的临床和病理特征
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Jan;45(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.691例纯导管原位癌的超声检查结果与临床病理及生物学特征的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):878-88. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12221.
6
Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor Progression.两年一次数字乳腺 X 线摄影筛查中导管原位癌的检出率:影像学表现支持肿瘤进展的病理模型。
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):424-432. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170673. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Trends in detection of invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ at biennial screening mammography in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.西班牙两年一次的筛查性乳房 X 光检查中浸润性癌和导管原位癌检出率的变化趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e83121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083121. eCollection 2013.
8
High rate of postoperative upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ when prioritizing ultrasound evaluation of mammography-detected lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.当优先考虑超声评估乳腺 X 线摄影检测到的病变时,导管原位癌的术后升级率较高:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02900-6.
9
Variations in the management of the axilla in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: evidence from the UK NHS breast screening programme audit of screen detected DCIS.英国国民保健署筛查性导管原位癌审计中对筛查性 DCIS 腋窝管理的变化:来自英国国民保健署乳腺筛查计划审计的证据。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.根据雌激素受体状态,1187 例乳腺单纯导管原位癌患者的临床病理、乳腺钼靶及超声表现。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):639-47. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2598-7. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound deep learning radiomics and clinical machine learning models to predict low nuclear grade, ER, PR, and HER2 receptor status in pure ductal carcinoma .超声深度学习影像组学和临床机器学习模型预测纯导管癌的低核分级、雌激素受体、孕激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体2受体状态
Gland Surg. 2024 Apr 29;13(4):512-527. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-417. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Annual Trends in Ultrasonography-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Lesions.超声引导下 14 号针乳腺病变穿刺活检的年度趋势。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Mar;21(3):259-267. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0695.
2
Nicaraven Attenuates Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Responses-Induced Tumor Metastasis.尼卡巴嗪减轻术后全身炎症反应诱导的肿瘤转移。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1068-1074. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08076-2. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Breast cancer statistics, 2019.乳腺癌统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):438-451. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
4
Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Detection Modality: A Multicenter Study Comparing Recurrence Between Mammography and Breast US.基于检测方式的导管原位癌结局:比较乳腺 X 线摄影与超声检查之间复发的多中心研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Oct;45(10):2623-2633. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.06.420. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question.导管原位癌:治疗还是不治疗,这是个问题。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug;121(4):285-292. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0478-6. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影与超声检测到的导管原位癌的长期监测:与第二乳腺癌相关的因素。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):37-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181844. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Twenty-Five Year Trends in the Incidence of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in US Women.美国女性导管原位癌发病率 25 年趋势
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jun;228(6):932-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
8
Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.仅在无症状患者中,比较乳腺钼靶与超声检查发现的导管原位癌的临床和病理特征
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Jan;45(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor Progression.两年一次数字乳腺 X 线摄影筛查中导管原位癌的检出率:影像学表现支持肿瘤进展的病理模型。
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):424-432. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170673. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The Whole Truth.导管原位癌:全面真相。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):246-255. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.