• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卵胞浆内单精子注射对非男性因素不孕症的影响——一项批判性综述

The Impact of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Non-Male Factor Infertility-A Critical Review.

作者信息

Glenn Tanya L, Kotlyar Alex M, Seifer David B

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Section of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 14;10(12):2616. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122616.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10122616
PMID:34198564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8231975/
Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was originally designed to overcome barriers due to male factor infertility. However, a surveillance study found that ICSI use in non-male factor infertility increased from 15.4% to 66.9% between 1996 and 2012. Numerous studies have investigated fertilization rate, total fertilization failure, and live birth rate per cycle (LBR), comparing the use of ICSI versus conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for non-male factor infertility. The overwhelming conclusion shows no increase in fertilization rate or LBR per cycle with the use of ICSI for non-male factor infertility. The overuse of ICSI is likely related to the desire to avoid a higher rate of total fertilization failure in IVF. However, data supporting the benefit of using ICSI for non-male factor infertility is lacking, and 33 couples would need to be treated with ICSI unnecessarily to avoid one case of total fertilization failure. Such practice increases the cost to the patient, increases the burden on embryologist's time, and is a misapplication of resources. Additionally, there remains conflicting data regarding the safety of offspring conceived by ICSI and potential damage to the oocyte. Thus, the use of ICSI should be limited to those with male factor infertility or a history of total fertilization factor infertility due to uncertainties of potential adverse impact and lack of proven benefit in non-male factor infertility.

摘要

卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)最初旨在克服男性因素导致的不孕障碍。然而,一项监测研究发现,1996年至2012年间,非男性因素不孕中ICSI的使用比例从15.4%增至66.9%。众多研究调查了受精率、完全受精失败率以及每个周期的活产率(LBR),比较了在非男性因素不孕中使用ICSI与传统体外受精(IVF)的情况。压倒性的结论表明,在非男性因素不孕中使用ICSI并不会提高每个周期的受精率或活产率。ICSI的过度使用可能与避免IVF中较高的完全受精失败率的愿望有关。然而,缺乏支持在非男性因素不孕中使用ICSI有益的数据,而且为避免一例完全受精失败,需要对33对夫妇进行不必要的ICSI治疗。这种做法增加了患者的费用,增加了胚胎学家的时间负担,并且是资源的误用。此外,关于ICSI受孕后代的安全性以及对卵母细胞的潜在损害,仍存在相互矛盾的数据。因此,由于潜在负面影响的不确定性以及在非男性因素不孕中缺乏已证实的益处,ICSI的使用应仅限于男性因素不孕或有完全受精失败史的患者。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Non-Male Factor Infertility-A Critical Review.卵胞浆内单精子注射对非男性因素不孕症的影响——一项批判性综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 14;10(12):2616. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122616.
2
The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age.胞浆内单精子注射在高龄产妇非男性因素不孕中的作用。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):119-124. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew298. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.ICSI 并不会增加非男性因素不孕的累积活产率。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1322-1330. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey118.
4
Are we Justified Doing Routine Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Nonmale Factor Infertility? A Retrospective Study Comparing Reproductive Outcomes between Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Nonmale Factor Infertility.我们在非男性因素不孕症中进行常规卵胞浆内单精子注射是否合理?一项比较非男性因素不孕症中受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射生殖结局的回顾性研究。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):210-215. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_8_19.
5
Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates.在输卵管结扎女性的体外受精周期中使用卵胞浆内单精子注射技术并不能提高妊娠率或活产率。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2750-2755. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew247. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.非男性因素不孕症的卵胞浆内单精子注射的应用及结局
Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
7
Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis.体外受精与胞浆内单精子注射治疗非男性因素不孕的临床妊娠率比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun;49(6):101706. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101706. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis.胞浆内单精子注射是否能提高明确不明原因不孕夫妇的受精率并降低总受精失败率?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
9
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not superior to conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).胞浆内单精子注射在非男性因素不孕且进行胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体(PGT-A)的夫妇中并不优于常规体外受精。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35(2):317-327. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa002.
10
In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure.体外受精-卵胞浆内单精子注射分裂:一种预防受精失败的授精方法。
Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02978-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).揭示卵胞浆内单精子注射、胚胎植入前遗传学检测和囊胚移植应用中的临床差异:一项使用辅助生殖技术协会数据库(2014 - 2020年)的综合研究
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar;42(3):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
'Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) paradox' and 'andrological ignorance': AI in the era of fourth industrial revolution to navigate the blind spots.“胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)悖论”和“男科无知”:第四次工业革命时代的人工智能探索盲点。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01193-y.
3
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes among Sibling Oocytes Using Different Culture Systems-Conventional IVF versus INVOcell Device-And Evaluation of INVOcell User Satisfaction: The INVOcIVF Study.不同培养系统(常规 IVF 与 INVOcell 设备)下使用同胞卵母细胞的治疗结局比较——INVOcell 装置的用户满意度评估:INVOcIVF 研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;19(19):12391. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912391.
4
Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment.美国体外受精州立保险覆盖 mandate 的影响:综述与批判性评估。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Aug 4;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00984-5.
5
De novo mutations in children born after medical assisted reproduction.医学辅助生殖后出生的儿童中的新生突变。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1360-1369. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac068.
6
Differences in ICSI utilization rates among states with insurance mandates for ART coverage.各州对 ART 覆盖范围的保险要求不同,导致 ICSI 利用率也存在差异。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Nov 30;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00856-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age.比较非男性因素不孕和高龄产妇夫妇的体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射对活产率的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Mar;38(3):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-02026-8. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
The risk of birth defects with conception by ART.ART 受孕的出生缺陷风险。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):116-129. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa272.
3
Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study.重新审视传统的体外受精:卵胞浆内单精子注射对非男性因素不孕更有效吗?一项随机对照双盲研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Sep;50(7):101990. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101990. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial.卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)与传统体外受精(IVF)对高龄产妇的作用——一项随机对照试验
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jan;38(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
The effect of ICSI in infertility couples with non-male factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.卵胞浆内单精子注射对非男性因素不孕夫妇的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Dec;37(12):2929-2945. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01970-9. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility.非严重男性不育症患者行卵胞浆内单精子注射与常规体外受精的产科及围生期结局比较。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion.卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)用于非男性因素所致不孕:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Aug;114(2):239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Do state insurance mandates alter ICSI utilization?国家保险授权是否会改变卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的使用情况?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Apr 25;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00589-w.
9
ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility.ICSI 并不能改善非男性因素导致的卵巢反应不良的自身免疫性不育患者的妊娠结局。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Mar 27;35(3):583-594. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez301.
10
Comparing fertilization rates from intracytoplasmic sperm injection to conventional in vitro fertilization among women of advanced age with non-male factor infertility: a meta-analysis.比较高龄非男性因素不孕妇女行卵胞浆内单精子注射与常规体外受精的受精率:一项荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Feb;113(2):354-363.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.035.