• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代乳腺癌确证性试验的方法与设计

Methods and Designs of Modern Breast Cancer Confirmatory Trials.

作者信息

Péron Julien, Reverdy Thibaut, Smenteck Colette, Cortet Marion, You Benoît, Freyer Gilles

机构信息

Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69002 Lyon, France.

Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS UMR 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;13(11):2757. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112757.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13112757
PMID:34199352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8199547/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit-risk assessments of new drugs for breast cancer (BC) face several challenges, as all stakeholders do not agree on the evidence bar required for market authorization, and by the fragmentation of breast cancer diagnosis. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in methods and designs of breast cancer confirmatory trials.

METHODS

All phase III randomized trials published between 2001 and 2020 and assessing systemic BC therapies were included. Trials' main characteristics, endpoints, and statistical methods were collected using a standardized data extraction form.

RESULTS

A total of 347 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. While most older trials (79%) included all subtypes of breast cancer, most recent trials populations were limited to one large intrinsic BC subgroup (69%). The use of gatekeeping testing strategies increased dramatically from 9% to 71%. The use of overall survival (OS) as an endpoint in the trials increased over time, but its use as a primary endpoint remained infrequent. The inclusion of OS testing in a hierarchical sequence in case of positive testing of a tumor-centered or composite endpoint appeared to have become the new standard.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate some improvements in the quality of the evidence-base supporting new breast cancer drugs. The rigorous assessment of patient-relevant endpoints has increased over time, but this improvement is mainly related to the analysis of OS as a secondary endpoint analyzed in a hierarchical sequence.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌新药的获益-风险评估面临诸多挑战,因为所有利益相关者对于市场授权所需的证据标准未达成一致,且乳腺癌诊断存在碎片化情况。本研究的目的是描述乳腺癌确证性试验的方法和设计的变化。

方法

纳入2001年至2020年间发表的所有评估乳腺癌全身治疗的III期随机试验。使用标准化数据提取表收集试验的主要特征、终点和统计方法。

结果

共有347项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准。虽然大多数早期试验(79%)纳入了所有乳腺癌亚型,但最近的试验人群仅限于一个大的内在性乳腺癌亚组(69%)。守门测试策略的使用从9%急剧增加到71%。试验中作为终点使用总生存期(OS)的情况随时间增加,但其作为主要终点的使用仍然不常见。在以肿瘤为中心的终点或复合终点呈阳性测试时将OS测试纳入分层序列似乎已成为新标准。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,支持乳腺癌新药的证据基础质量有了一些改善。随着时间的推移,对与患者相关终点的严格评估有所增加,但这种改善主要与将OS作为分层序列中分析的次要终点的分析有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/971b/8199547/1b9a45ec2d95/cancers-13-02757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/971b/8199547/37f4d07ee9be/cancers-13-02757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/971b/8199547/1b9a45ec2d95/cancers-13-02757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/971b/8199547/37f4d07ee9be/cancers-13-02757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/971b/8199547/1b9a45ec2d95/cancers-13-02757-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods and Designs of Modern Breast Cancer Confirmatory Trials.现代乳腺癌确证性试验的方法与设计
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;13(11):2757. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112757.
2
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
3
4
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.
5
Vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) targeting therapies for endocrine refractory or resistant metastatic breast cancer.针对内分泌难治性或耐药性转移性乳腺癌的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)靶向治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD008941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008941.pub2.
6
An overview of randomized clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer: variables affecting regulatory drug approval.转移性乳腺癌随机临床试验综述:影响药物监管批准的变量
Anticancer Drugs. 2014 Oct;25(9):992-7. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000130.
7
8
Confirmatory versus explorative endpoint analysis: Decision-making on the basis of evidence available from market authorization and early benefit assessment for oncology drugs.确证性与探索性终点分析:基于肿瘤药物上市许可和早期获益评估获得的证据进行决策。
Health Policy. 2018 Jun;122(6):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Combining progression-free survival and overall survival as a novel composite endpoint for glioblastoma trials.将无进展生存期和总生存期结合起来作为胶质母细胞瘤试验的一种新型复合终点。
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Aug;17(8):1106-13. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou345. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Road Map to Safe and Well-Designed De-escalation Trials of Systemic Adjuvant Therapy for Solid Tumors.安全且精心设计的肿瘤系统辅助治疗降阶梯试验的路线图。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4120-4129. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01382. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Evaluating the evidence behind the surrogate measures included in the FDA's table of surrogate endpoints as supporting approval of cancer drugs.评估美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)替代终点表格中所包含的替代指标背后的证据,以支持癌症药物的批准。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 13;21:100332. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100332. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer.
瑞博西利联合氟维司群治疗晚期乳腺癌的总生存期。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):514-524. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911149. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
The Effect of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant on Overall Survival in Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed on Endocrine Therapy-MONARCH 2: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阿贝西利联合氟维司群治疗激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌的疗效:内分泌治疗进展后总生存的影响——MONARCH 2 随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):116-124. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782.
5
Current state of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research.当前生活质量和患者报告结局研究的现状。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
Effect Sizes Hypothesized and Observed in Contemporary Phase III Trials of Targeted and Immunological Therapies for Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症靶向和免疫疗法当代III期试验中假设和观察到的效应量
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Nov 27;2(4):pky037. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky037. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
The Value of Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From a Survey of Patients and Providers.无进展生存期在转移性乳腺癌中的价值:患者与医疗服务提供者调查结果
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jun 21;4(1):2381468319855386. doi: 10.1177/2381468319855386. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
8
An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate.基于缓解率这一代谢终点的美国食品和药物管理局批准的癌症药物概述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):915-921. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0583.
9
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.
10
Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive, early breast cancer in trials of adjuvant trastuzumab for up to 1 year: a systematic review and meta-analysis.曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗 1 年以内的 HER2 阳性早期乳腺癌患者中无病生存替代总生存的研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):361-370. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30750-2. Epub 2019 Jan 29.