• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宾夕法尼亚州医院绩效的多方面证据。

Multifaced Evidence of Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania.

作者信息

Kim Younhee, Lee Keon-Hyung, Choi Sung W

机构信息

School of Public Affairs, Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17050, USA.

Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;9(6):670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060670.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9060670
PMID:34199711
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228833/
Abstract

As health care costs and demands for health care services have been rising for decades in the United States, health care reforms have focused on increasing the performance of health care delivery. Competition has been considered as a mechanism to improve the quality of health care services and operational performance. Evidence on health care performance and market competition, however, has not sufficiently been reported to track its progress. The purpose of this study is twofold: First, we measure hospital performance over nine years, using the Malmquist Productivity Index. Second, we examine the impact of market competition on hospital efficiency in Pennsylvania, using a two-stage estimation procedure. The bootstrapped Malmquist productivity indices resulted in noticeable performance improvements. However, no steady performance trends were found during the course of nine years. In examining the impact of market competition, the bootstrapped panel Tobit analysis was applied after computing the efficiency scores with Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the Tobit model found that hospitals run more efficiently in less competitive regions than in more competitive regions. The finding implies that hospitals underperforming in productivity growth should benchmark best practices of efficient hospitals to improve their productivity level. Another implication is that market competition would not be the best approach to effect the improvement of hospital efficiency in delivering health care services.

摘要

在美国,几十年来医疗保健成本和对医疗保健服务的需求一直在上升,医疗保健改革一直专注于提高医疗保健服务的绩效。竞争被视为提高医疗保健服务质量和运营绩效的一种机制。然而,关于医疗保健绩效和市场竞争的证据尚未得到充分报道,无法追踪其进展情况。本研究的目的有两个:第一,我们使用Malmquist生产率指数衡量九年来的医院绩效。第二,我们使用两阶段估计程序研究市场竞争对宾夕法尼亚州医院效率的影响。自抽样的Malmquist生产率指数显示出显著的绩效改善。然而,在九年的时间里没有发现稳定的绩效趋势。在研究市场竞争的影响时,在用数据包络分析计算效率得分后,应用了自抽样面板Tobit分析。Tobit模型的结果发现,在竞争较小的地区,医院的运营效率高于竞争激烈的地区。这一发现意味着,生产率增长表现不佳的医院应该以高效医院的最佳做法为基准,以提高其生产率水平。另一个含义是,市场竞争可能不是提高医院提供医疗保健服务效率的最佳方法。

相似文献

1
Multifaced Evidence of Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州医院绩效的多方面证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;9(6):670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060670.
2
The impact of the internal market on hospital efficiency, productivity and service quality.内部市场对医院效率、生产率和服务质量的影响。
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 May;2(2):75-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1019079526671.
3
Hospital competition and inpatient services efficiency in Taiwan: a longitudinal study.台湾地区医院竞争与住院服务效率:一项纵向研究。
Health Econ. 2011 Oct;20(10):1268-80. doi: 10.1002/hec.1676. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
4
Efficiency and Productivity of Public Hospitals in Serbia Using DEA-Malmquist Model and Tobit Regression Model, 2015-2019.塞尔维亚公立医院的效率和生产力:基于 DEA-Malmquist 模型和 Tobit 回归模型的 2015-2019 年分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312475.
5
Assessing the corporate green technology progress and environmental governance performance based on the panel data on industrial enterprises above designated size in Anhui Province, China.基于中国安徽省规模以上工业企业的面板数据,评估企业绿色技术进步和环境治理绩效。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):1151-1169. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10199-z. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Efficiency and productivity assessment of public hospitals in Greece during the crisis period 2009-2012.2009 - 2012年危机期间希腊公立医院的效率与生产率评估
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Apr 26;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0068-5. eCollection 2017.
7
Hospitals Productivity Measurement Using Data Envelopment Analysis Technique.运用数据包络分析技术进行医院生产率测量
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Nov;43(11):1576-81.
8
Productivity changes in OECD healthcare systems: bias-corrected Malmquist productivity approach.经合组织医疗体系中的生产率变化:偏差校正的马尔姆奎斯特生产率方法。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Oct;31(4):537-553. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2333. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Healthcare reform and productivity of Hospital: a DEA-based analysis from South West of Iran.医疗改革与医院生产率:基于数据包络分析的伊朗西南部研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Apr 24;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00403-x.
10
Does competition improve hospital performance: a DEA based evaluation from the Netherlands.竞争是否能提高医院绩效:来自荷兰的基于 DEA 的评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Aug;24(6):999-1017. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01529-8. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of DRG policy on the performance of tertiary hospital inpatient services in Chongqing, China: an interrupted time series study, 2020-2023.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)政策对中国重庆三级医院住院服务绩效的影响:一项2020 - 2023年的中断时间序列研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1523067. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1523067. eCollection 2025.
2
Association Between Hospital Efficiency and Quality of Care Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.按服务收费的前列腺癌医疗保险受益人的医院效率与医疗质量之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;16(24):4154. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244154.
3
Approach in inputs & outputs selection of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measurement in hospitals: A systematic review.医院数据包络分析(DEA)效率测量的投入和产出选择方法:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 14;19(8):e0293694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293694. eCollection 2024.
4
Differences in inpatient performance of public general hospitals following implementation of a points-counting payment based on diagnosis-related group: a robust multiple interrupted time series study in Wenzhou, China.基于诊断相关分组的点数制支付实施后公立综合医院住院绩效差异:中国温州一项稳健的多重中断时间序列研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e073913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073913.
5
Evaluating the efficiency of primary health care institutions in China: an improved three-stage data envelopment analysis approach.评价中国基层医疗机构的效率:一种改进的三阶段数据包络分析方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09979-3.
6
The impact of human resources for health on the health outcomes of Chinese people.卫生人力资源对中国人健康结果的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08540-y.
7
The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.医疗保健效率的核心:关于医院前沿分析的综合文献计量学综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;10(7):1316. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071316.
8
Dynamic Performance Assessment of Hospitals by Applying Credibility-Based Fuzzy Window Data Envelopment Analysis.基于可信度的模糊窗口数据包络分析法对医院的动态绩效评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 9;10(5):876. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050876.
9
Efficiency and Productivity of Public Hospitals in Serbia Using DEA-Malmquist Model and Tobit Regression Model, 2015-2019.塞尔维亚公立医院的效率和生产力:基于 DEA-Malmquist 模型和 Tobit 回归模型的 2015-2019 年分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312475.
10
The Impact of Public Reporting Schemes and Market Competition on Hospital Efficiency.公共报告计划和市场竞争对医院效率的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;9(8):1031. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081031.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficiency Comparison of Public Hospitals under Different Administrative Affiliations in China: A Pilot City Case.中国不同行政隶属关系下公立医院效率比较:以某试点城市为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;9(4):437. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040437.
2
Efficiency and productivity of county-level traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Hubei Province, China: A retrospective study based on 17 years of panel data.中国湖北省县级中医医院的效率和生产力:基于 17 年面板数据的回顾性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1308-1325. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3171. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Productivity growth and quality changes of hospitals in Taiwan: does ownership matter?台湾医院的生产力增长和质量变化:所有权重要吗?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Sep;22(3):451-461. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9465-3. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
4
A robust analysis of hospital efficiency and factors affecting variability.对医院效率及影响变异性因素的稳健分析。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2018 Feb;31(1):33-42. doi: 10.1177/0951484817730537. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
5
Productivity changes in OECD healthcare systems: bias-corrected Malmquist productivity approach.经合组织医疗体系中的生产率变化:偏差校正的马尔姆奎斯特生产率方法。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Oct;31(4):537-553. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2333. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Competition among health care providers: helpful or harmful?医疗服务提供者之间的竞争:有益还是有害?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0736-3.
7
Has competition increased hospital technical efficiency?竞争是否提高了医院的技术效率?
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Apr-Jun;34(2):106-12. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000061.
8
Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms.医院竞争能挽救生命吗?来自英国国民医疗服务体系患者选择改革的证据。
Econ J (London). 2011 Aug;121(554):F228-F260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x.
9
An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey.对土耳其医院行业的竞争与效率的考察。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2015 Dec;18(4):407-18. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9315-x. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
The impact of policy on hospital productivity: a time series analysis of Dutch hospitals.政策对医院生产力的影响:荷兰医院的时间序列分析。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2014 Jun;17(2):139-49. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9257-8. Epub 2013 Nov 21.