Galeano Javier, Gomez Miguel-Ángel, Rivas Fernando, Buldú Javier M
Complex System Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Social Sciences, Physical Activity, Sport and Leisure, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;23(7):799. doi: 10.3390/e23070799.
The aim of the current study was twofold: (i) to investigate the distribution of the strike positions of badminton players while quantifying the corresponding standard entropy and using an alternative metric (spatial entropy) related to winning and losing points and random positions; and (ii) to evaluate the standard entropy of the receiving positions. With the datasets of 259 badminton matches, we focused on the positions of players' strokes and the outcome of each point. First, we identified those regions of the court from which hits were most likely to be struck. Second, we computed the standard entropy of stroke positions, and then the spatial entropy, which also considers the order and clustering of the hitting locations in a two-dimensional Euclidean space. Both entropy quantifiers revealed high uncertainty in the striking position; however, specific court locations (i.e., the four corners) are preferred over the rest. When the outcome of each point was taken into account, we observed that the hitting patterns with lower entropy were associated with higher probabilities of winning points. On the contrary, players striking from more random positions were more prone to losing the points.
(i)在量化相应的标准熵并使用与胜负分及随机位置相关的替代度量(空间熵)的同时,调查羽毛球运动员击球位置的分布情况;(ii)评估接球位置的标准熵。利用259场羽毛球比赛的数据集,我们重点关注了球员击球的位置以及每一分的结果。首先,我们确定了球场上最有可能击球的区域。其次,我们计算了击球位置的标准熵,然后计算了空间熵,空间熵还考虑了二维欧几里得空间中击球位置的顺序和聚类情况。两个熵量化指标都显示出击球位置的高度不确定性;然而,特定的球场位置(即四个角)比其他位置更受青睐。当考虑每一分的结果时,我们观察到熵较低的击球模式与得分的较高概率相关。相反,从更随机位置击球的球员更容易失分。