Suppr超能文献

关于脊髓刺激和背根神经节刺激的脊髓上假说的探索:一项系统综述

Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Goudman Lisa, De Groote Sander, Linderoth Bengt, De Smedt Ann, Eldabe Sam, Duarte Rui V, Moens Maarten

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 23;10(13):2766. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132766.

Abstract

Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses ( = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways ( = 24); ascending medial pathway ( = 13); ascending lateral pathway ( = 10); affective/motivational influences ( = 8); spinal-cerebral (thalamic)-loop ( = 3) and miscellaneous ( = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence.

摘要

尽管脊髓刺激(SCS)已被证实具有疗效和有效性,但对于该疗法的脊髓上作用机制仍未达成共识。本研究的目的是基于人体、动物和计算研究,系统回顾先前提出的关于SCS脊髓上作用机制的假设。使用四个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、SCOPUS和Web of Science)进行检索,并进行回溯参考文献检索和咨询专家。研究方案在审查过程开始前进行了注册(PROSPERO CRD42020161531)。共纳入54篇出版物,其中21篇为动物研究,33篇为人体研究。从纳入研究中确定的脊髓上假设(n = 69)可根据提出的脊髓上假设分为六组,即下行通路(n = 24);内侧上行通路(n = 13);外侧上行通路(n = 10);情感/动机影响(n = 8);脊髓-脑(丘脑)环路(n = 3)和其他(n = 11)。为确定的假设提供了科学支持。下行伤害性抑制通路、内侧和外侧通路的调制是关于SCS脊髓上作用机制最常报道的假设。这些假设主要得到了证据主体中具有高或中等可信度的研究的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e5/8268298/c215e86b9171/jcm-10-02766-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验