Gurdian Cristhiam E, Torrico Damir D, Li Bin, Tuuri Georgianna, Prinyawiwatkul Witoon
School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
Foods. 2021 Jun 25;10(7):1480. doi: 10.3390/foods10071480.
Currently, many consumers are reluctant to consume edible-cricket protein (ECP). Chocolate brownie (CB) formulations without (WO) and with (W) 6%/ ECP (CBWO and CBW, respectively) were presented under two informed conditions: formulated without ECP (ECP-) and formulated with ECP+benefits (ECP+). CBWO- (CBWO presented with the "ECP-" claim), CBWO+ (CBWO presented with the "ECP+" claim), CBW- (CBW presented with the "ECP-" claim), and CBW+ (CBW presented with the "ECP+" claim) were evaluated by 210 consumers for expected and actual attribute liking, and after-tasting consumption and purchase intent. Multi-way ANOVA, principal component analysis, and agglomerative clustering examined liking. Cochran-Q tests compared actual-liking profiles, purchase and consumption intent. Before tasting, CBW- obtained the lowest appearance liking, flavor liking was higher for ECP- than for ECP+ for either formulation, and ECP+ decreased aroma and overall liking only for CBWO. After tasting, CBWO had higher liking than CBW (except for aroma) for either informed condition. Regardless of the formulation, ECP- and ECP+ had similar actual liking. Nevertheless, ECP+ prevented negative disconfirmation for both formulations while ECP- decreased texture liking (for CBWO) and all liking (for CBW) upon tasting. Females' consumption intent was higher for CBWO regardless of the informed condition, but CBW+ achieved a similar purchase intent to CBWO- for both genders.
目前,许多消费者不愿食用食用蟋蟀蛋白(ECP)。在两种告知条件下展示了不含(WO)和含有(W)6% ECP的巧克力布朗尼(CB)配方(分别为CBWO和CBW):不含ECP(ECP-)配方和含有ECP及相关益处(ECP+)配方。210名消费者对CBWO-(展示“ECP-”声明的CBWO)、CBWO+(展示“ECP+”声明的CBWO)、CBW-(展示“ECP-”声明的CBW)和CBW+(展示“ECP+”声明的CBW)进行了预期和实际属性喜好、品尝后消费和购买意愿的评估。采用多因素方差分析、主成分分析和凝聚聚类分析来研究喜好情况。 Cochr an-Q检验比较了实际喜好概况、购买和消费意愿。在品尝前,CBW-的外观喜好得分最低,对于两种配方,ECP-的风味喜好高于ECP+,且ECP+仅降低了CBWO的香气和总体喜好。品尝后,在两种告知条件下,CBWO的喜好度均高于CBW(香气除外)。无论配方如何,ECP-和ECP+的实际喜好相似。然而,ECP+可防止两种配方出现负面的不一致性,而ECP-在品尝时降低了CBWO的质地喜好(对于CBWO)和所有喜好(对于CBW)。无论告知条件如何,女性对CBWO的消费意愿更高,但CBW+在男女两性中的购买意愿与CBWO-相似。