Probst Katja, Nurjadi Dennis, Heeg Klaus, Frede Anne-Marie, Dalpke Alexander H, Boutin Sébastien
Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 16;10(6):726. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060726.
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are a growing problem in healthcare systems worldwide. While whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has become a powerful tool for analyzing transmission and possible outbreaks, it remains laborious, and the limitations in diagnostic workflows are not well studied. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of WGS and real-time multiplex PCR (RT-qPCR) for diagnosing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. In this study, we analyzed 92 phenotypically carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, sent to the University Hospital Heidelberg in 2019, by the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) and compared WGS and RT-qPCR as genotypic carbapenemase detection methods. In total, 80.4% of the collected isolates were identified as carbapenemase producers. For six isolates, discordant results were recorded for WGS, PCR and CIM, as the carbapenemase genes were initially not detected by WGS. A reanalysis using raw reads, rather than assembly, highlighted a coverage issue with failure to detect carbapenemases located in contigs with a coverage lower than 10×, which were then discarded. Our study shows that multiplex RT-qPCR and CIM can be a simple alternative to WGS for basic surveillance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. Using WGS in clinical workflow has some limitations, especially regarding coverage and sensitivity. We demonstrate that antimicrobial resistance gene detection should be performed on the raw reads or non-curated draft genome to increase sensitivity.
耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌在全球医疗系统中是一个日益严重的问题。虽然全基因组测序(WGS)已成为分析传播和可能的暴发的有力工具,但它仍然费力,而且诊断工作流程中的局限性尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较WGS和实时多重PCR(RT-qPCR)在诊断耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌方面的性能。在本研究中,我们通过碳青霉烯灭活方法(CIM)分析了2019年送至海德堡大学医院的92株表型耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌,并将WGS和RT-qPCR作为基因型碳青霉烯酶检测方法进行比较。总共80.4%的收集菌株被鉴定为碳青霉烯酶产生菌。对于6株菌株,WGS、PCR和CIM记录到不一致的结果,因为最初WGS未检测到碳青霉烯酶基因。使用原始读数而非组装进行重新分析,突出了一个覆盖问题,即未能检测到位于覆盖度低于10×的重叠群中的碳青霉烯酶,这些重叠群随后被丢弃。我们的研究表明,多重RT-qPCR和CIM可以作为WGS的一种简单替代方法,用于对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌进行基本监测。在临床工作流程中使用WGS存在一些局限性,特别是在覆盖度和灵敏度方面。我们证明,应在原始读数或未整理的草图基因组上进行抗菌药物耐药基因检测,以提高灵敏度。