• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项双盲交叉随机对照试验,分析三种不同数字工作流程中整体式氧化锆种植体固定义齿(iFDP)的技术和临床性能。

A Double-Blind Crossover RCT Analyzing Technical and Clinical Performance of Monolithic ZrO Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP) in Three Different Digital Workflows.

作者信息

Gintaute Aiste, Weber Karin, Zitzmann Nicola U, Brägger Urs, Ferrari Marco, Joda Tim

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.

Private Dental Office, 4314 Zeiningen, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 16;10(12):2661. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122661.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10122661
PMID:34208773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8235369/
Abstract

This double-blind randomized controlled trial with a crossover design analyzed the technical and clinical performance of three-unit monolithic ZrO implant-fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs), prepared using two complete digital workflows (Test-1, Test-2) and one mixed analog-digital workflow (Control). Each of the 20 study patients received three iFDPs, resulting in 60 restorations for analysis. The quality of the restorations was assessed by analyzing laboratory cross-mounting and calculating the chairside adjustment time required during fitting. All iFDPs could be produced successfully with all three workflows. The highest cross-mounting success rate was observed for the original pairing iFDP/model of the Control group. Overall, 60% of iFDPs prepared with Test-1 workflow did not require chairside adjustment compared with 50% for Test-2 and 30% for Controls. The mean total chairside adjustment time, as the sum of interproximal, pontic, and occlusal corrections was 2.59 ± 2.51 min (Control), 2.88 ± 2.86 min (Test-1), and 3.87 ± 3.02 min (Test-2). All tested workflows were feasible for treatment with iFDPs in posterior sites on a soft tissue level type implant system. For clinical routine, it has to be considered that chairside adjustments may be necessary, at least in every second patient, independent on the workflow used.

摘要

这项采用交叉设计的双盲随机对照试验分析了三件式整体式氧化锆种植体固定义齿(iFDP)的技术和临床性能,这些义齿采用两种完整的数字工作流程(测试1、测试2)和一种混合模拟-数字工作流程(对照)制备。20名研究患者每人接受三件iFDP,共60个修复体用于分析。通过分析实验室交叉安装情况并计算试戴时所需的椅旁调整时间来评估修复体的质量。所有三种工作流程均能成功制作所有iFDP。对照组原始配对的iFDP/模型的交叉安装成功率最高。总体而言,采用测试1工作流程制备的iFDP中,60%不需要椅旁调整,而测试2为50%,对照为30%。作为邻面、桥体和咬合调整总和的平均椅旁总调整时间,对照组为2.59±2.51分钟,测试1为2.88±2.86分钟,测试2为3.87±3.02分钟。在软组织水平型种植体系统的后牙部位,所有测试的工作流程用于iFDP治疗都是可行的。在临床常规操作中,必须考虑到,至少每两名患者中就可能有一名需要椅旁调整,这与所使用的工作流程无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/da4854e9d126/jcm-10-02661-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/216789d62ff6/jcm-10-02661-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/a98538512e3d/jcm-10-02661-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/de4bb19cc324/jcm-10-02661-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/da4854e9d126/jcm-10-02661-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/216789d62ff6/jcm-10-02661-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/a98538512e3d/jcm-10-02661-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/de4bb19cc324/jcm-10-02661-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58e/8235369/da4854e9d126/jcm-10-02661-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Double-Blind Crossover RCT Analyzing Technical and Clinical Performance of Monolithic ZrO Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP) in Three Different Digital Workflows.一项双盲交叉随机对照试验,分析三种不同数字工作流程中整体式氧化锆种植体固定义齿(iFDP)的技术和临床性能。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 16;10(12):2661. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122661.
2
Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.比较三种用于整体氧化锆种植体固定义齿治疗的数字化工作流程的时间效率和成本分析:一项双盲 RCT 研究。
J Dent. 2021 Oct;113:103779. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103779. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: A double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial.患者报告的结果测量与整体氧化锆植入式固定义齿在全数字化流程中的专业牙科评估比较:一项双盲交叉随机对照试验。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan;32(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13589. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: A crossover clinical trial.采用全数字和模拟工作流程制作的3单位牙支持固定义齿的咬合调整:一项交叉临床试验。
J Dent. 2023 Jan;128:104365. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104365. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.数字化工作流程中整体式种植冠修复治疗的时间效率分析:一项随机对照试验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1401-1406. doi: 10.1111/clr.12753. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Quantitative clinical adjustment analysis of posterior single implant crown in a chairside digital workflow: A randomized controlled trial.椅旁数字化工作流程中后牙单颗种植体修复的临床量化调整分析:一项随机对照试验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Nov;30(11):1059-1066. doi: 10.1111/clr.13519. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.分段式轻微饰面整体氧化锆固定修复体在全口种植义齿修复中的数字化流程:2 年临床随访。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-13. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12323. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
8
Clinical Fitting and Adjustment Time for Implant-Supported Crowns Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows.比较数字化和传统工作流程的种植体支持冠的临床试戴与调整时间
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Oct;18(5):946-954. doi: 10.1111/cid.12377. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
9
Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial.种植体牙冠数字化与传统工作流程的时间效率分析:一项前瞻性临床交叉试验
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1047-53. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3963.
10
[A pilot clinical study of immediate provisionalization with a chairside computer aided design and computer aided manufacture monolithic crown for single tooth immediate implant placement].[一项关于单颗牙即刻种植时椅旁计算机辅助设计与制造一体式牙冠即刻临时修复的前瞻性临床研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 9;52(1):3-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.01.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Similar patient-reported satisfaction and professional appraisal of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis fabricated by different workflows.不同工作流程制作的种植体支持固定义齿的患者报告满意度和专业评估相似。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Mar;26(1):21-22. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01111-0. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Intraoral Scan Accuracy and Time Efficiency in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review.种植体支持的固定局部义齿的口内扫描准确性和时间效率:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48027. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Comparative Analysis between 3D-Printed Models Designed with Generic and Dental-Specific Software.

本文引用的文献

1
Disruptive Innovation in Dentistry: What It Is and What Could Be Next.牙科领域的颠覆性创新:是什么以及接下来可能是什么。
J Dent Res. 2021 May;100(5):448-453. doi: 10.1177/0022034520978774. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
Implant-Supported Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Using Coded Healing Abutments and Fabricated Using a Digital Workflow: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.采用编码愈合基台和数字化工作流程制作的种植体支持三单位固定义齿:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Nov/Dec;33(6):609-619. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6707.
3
Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial.
使用通用软件和牙科专用软件设计的3D打印模型之间的对比分析
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;11(9):216. doi: 10.3390/dj11090216.
4
The Complete Digital Workflow in Fixed Prosthodontics Updated: A Systematic Review.固定修复学中的完整数字工作流程更新:一项系统评价。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;11(5):679. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050679.
5
Conventional, Speed Sintering and High-Speed Sintering of Zirconia: A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Applications in Dentistry with a Focus on Precision, Mechanical and Optical Parameters.氧化锆的传统烧结、快速烧结和高速烧结:对牙科应用现状的系统评价,重点关注精度、机械和光学参数。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 20;11(16):4892. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164892.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: A double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial.患者报告的结果测量与整体氧化锆植入式固定义齿在全数字化流程中的专业牙科评估比较:一项双盲交叉随机对照试验。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan;32(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13589. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
数字化与传统印模制取聚焦于牙间隙:一项临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):4725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134725.
4
In-vitro polishing of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: An evaluation with SEM and confocal profilometry.CAD/CAM 陶瓷修复体的体外抛光:SEM 和共聚焦轮廓术评估。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Jul;107:103761. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103761. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Recent Trends and Future Direction of Dental Research in the Digital Era.数字时代牙科研究的最新趋势和未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):1987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061987.
6
Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update.患者数字化与传统全牙弓印模的准确性:最新进展
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):688. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030688.
7
Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro.口腔内扫描仪上下颌骨注册精度的体外研究。
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
8
The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials.椅旁数字牙科及材料的现状
Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;63(2):175-197. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002.
9
CAD/CAM implant crowns in a digital workflow: Five-year follow-up of a prospective clinical trial.CAD/CAM 种植体牙冠的数字化流程:一项前瞻性临床试验的五年随访结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):169-174. doi: 10.1111/cid.12681. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review.数字化技术用于制作种植体支持修复体是否比传统技术更有效率和/或更有效:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:184-195. doi: 10.1111/clr.13300.