Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136978.
To compare the skeletal, dental, and esthetic changes produced by three functional devices, Fränkel-2 appliance (FR-2), Twin Block (TB), and Occlus-o-Guide (O-o-G), for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. : Sixty-five patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion were divided into three groups and were analyzed through cephalometric analysis of skeletal, dental, and esthetic variables before and after treatment. The first group of 23 patients (F: 9; M: 14; mean age: 10.3 ± 1.08 years) was treated with FR-2, the second group of 18 patients (F: 8; M: 10; mean age 10.7 ± 1.05 years) was treated with TB, the third group (F: 11; M: 13; mean age: 9.05 ± 0.39 years) of 24 patients was treated with O-o-G. The structural effects of the three devices were compared with a control group generated by the growth variations reported in the cephalometric atlas of Bhatia and Leighton. Esthetic analysis was performed comparing the results of the patients treated with a control group of 20 subjects with mandibular retrognathia and Class II Division 1 malocclusion, not subjected to therapy. : The three devices resulted in a significant increase in mandibular length, with higher results obtained for FR-2 and TB. A statistically significant increase in the IMPA angle was found for the O-o-G group, and a notable reduction of both overjet and overbite was detected in all three groups of treated patients. The esthetic evaluation showed overall more significant results in the TB group, especially with regard to the reduction of facial convexity. The retrusion of the upper lip was on average more significant in the O-o-G group, followed by that in the TB. : All three devices have proven to be effective overall in resolving skeletal changes and improving facial esthetics.
为了比较三种功能性矫治器(Fränkel-2 矫治器、双板矫治器和 Occlus-o-Guide 矫治器)治疗安氏Ⅱ类错颌的骨骼、牙齿和美学变化,将 65 例安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌患者分为三组,通过治疗前后的头颅侧位片的骨骼、牙齿和美学变量的分析。第一组 23 例患者(F:9;M:14;平均年龄:10.3±1.08 岁)接受 FR-2 治疗,第二组 18 例患者(F:8;M:10;平均年龄:10.7±1.05 岁)接受 TB 治疗,第三组(F:11;M:13;平均年龄:9.05±0.39 岁)的 24 例患者接受 O-o-G 治疗。将三种设备的结构效果与 Bhatia 和 Leighton 头影测量图谱中报告的生长变化生成的对照组进行比较。通过对 20 例下颌后缩安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌患者的治疗结果与未接受治疗的对照组进行美学分析。结果显示:三种矫治器均能显著增加下颌长度,FR-2 和 TB 的效果更为显著。O-o-G 组 IMPA 角显著增加,三组治疗患者的覆盖和覆盖深度均显著减少。美学评估显示,TB 组总体效果更为显著,尤其是在减少面凸度方面。上唇回缩在 O-o-G 组平均更为显著,其次是 TB 组。结论:三种矫治器在解决骨骼变化和改善面部美学方面均有效。