• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study.比较研究 II 类功能矫正治疗的美学和结构方面:一项病例对照回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136978.
2
Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.与未经治疗的II类样本相比,双阻板矫治器和弗兰克FR-2矫治器产生的治疗效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Dec;116(6):597-609. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70193-9.
3
Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.双板和赫伯氏矫治器对下颌后缩安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类患者的牙颌面影响
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):164-72. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt013. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.双板矫治器与固定矫治器早期治疗安氏Ⅱ类错颌的随机对照研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1111-1121. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3426.
5
Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.在不同颈椎成熟阶段的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者中,对Twin Block矫治器效果的头影测量评估
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jun;21(3):73-84. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.073-084.oar.
6
Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.双阻板矫治器和下颌前导矫治器在安氏II类错颌畸形矫治中的作用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Feb;163(2):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.09.021. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial.功能性治疗双板与肌激动器对发育性骨性Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者咽气道形态影响的头影测量研究:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):998. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03701-9.
8
[Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].[固定 Twin-Block 矫治器治疗与拔牙治疗对骨性 II 类错牙合畸形软组织角度的评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Feb;25(1):82-6.
9
Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.下颌骨发育不足的安氏II类1分类病例使用Twin Block矫治器时并发的骨骼和牙槽骨变化:一项头影测量研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):218-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.105014.
10
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.对使用延长疗程、强化、带环Herbst矫治器随后使用固定矫治器治疗的安氏II类1分类患者的头影测量研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular and condylar growth using artificial intelligence tools: a comparison of twin-block and Frankel II Appliances.使用人工智能工具对下颌骨和髁突生长进行三维分析:双阻板矫治器和Frankel II矫治器的比较
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05624-z.
2
Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities.突面畸形正畸治疗专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Feb 1;17(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00338-4.
3
Evaluation of Facial Aesthetic Changes in Growing Class II Patients Treated with Herbst or Elastodontics: A Retrospective Study.使用Herbst矫治器或弹性矫治器治疗的生长发育期II类错颌患者面部美学变化的评估:一项回顾性研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;12(12):411. doi: 10.3390/dj12120411.
4
Effectiveness of Elastodontic Devices for Correcting Sagittal Malocclusions in Mixed Dentition Patients: A Scoping Review.弹性正畸装置矫正混合牙列期患者矢状错颌的有效性:一项范围综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 2;12(8):247. doi: 10.3390/dj12080247.
5
Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.双板矫治器与赫伯氏矫治器治疗儿童安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04027-w.
6
Effect of condylar chondrocyte exosomes on condylar cartilage osteogenesis in rats under tensile stress.髁突软骨细胞外泌体对拉伸应力下大鼠髁突软骨成骨的影响
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 6;10:1061855. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1061855. eCollection 2022.
7
The Efficacy of a New AMCOP Elastodontic Protocol for Orthodontic Interceptive Treatment: A Case Series and Literature Overview.新型 AMCOP 弹性正畸协议在正畸阻断治疗中的疗效:病例系列和文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 16;19(2):988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020988.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes after Functional Therapy.功能性治疗后软组织变化的三维评估
Scanning. 2021 Apr 24;2021:9928101. doi: 10.1155/2021/9928101. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.正畸医生、牙科学生、正畸患者及外科正畸患者的侧面宏观美学感知比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Dec 1;12(12):e1109-e1116. doi: 10.4317/jced.57593. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances.三种不同功能矫治器治疗后面部软组织变化的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Oct;158(4):518-526. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.020.
4
Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: .Frankel 2 矫治器与改良双板矫治器治疗儿童和青少年安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)的Ⅰ期疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):202-208. doi: 10.2319/042419-290.1. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
5
General health & psychological distress in children with temporomandibular disorder.颞下颌关节紊乱症患儿的总体健康状况与心理困扰
Clin Ter. 2019 Sep-Oct;170(5):e321-e327. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2154.
6
Post-treatment cephalometric changes in adolescent patients with Class II malocclusion treated using two different functional appliance systems for an extended time period: a randomized clinical trial.治疗时间延长的两种不同功能矫治器系统治疗的青少年安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]患者的治疗后头影测量变化:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):135-143. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz059.
7
Epidemiology of Malocclusion in 3,491 Subjects Attending Public Dental Service in Rome (Italy): Evaluation of the Orthodontic Treatment Need Index.意大利罗马3491名接受公共牙科服务患者的错颌畸形流行病学:正畸治疗需求指数评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 May 1;20(5):631-638.
8
Prevalence of craniomandibular disorders in orthodontic pediatric population and possible interactions with anxiety and stress.正畸儿科人群颅颌面部疾病的患病率及与焦虑和压力的可能相互作用。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):317-323. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.04.13.
9
Treatment of class II malocclussion: A comparative study of the effects of twin-block and fatigue resistant device.II类错颌畸形的治疗:双阻板矫治器与抗疲劳矫治器效果的对比研究
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;21(12):1557-1563. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_110_18.
10
Minimally invasive orthodontics: elastodontic therapy in a growing patient affected by Dentinogenesis Imperfecta.微创正畸学:对一名患有牙本质发育不全的生长发育期患者进行弹性正畸治疗。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):34-38. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.034. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.

比较研究 II 类功能矫正治疗的美学和结构方面:一项病例对照回顾性研究。

Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136978.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18136978
PMID:34209944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8296913/
Abstract

To compare the skeletal, dental, and esthetic changes produced by three functional devices, Fränkel-2 appliance (FR-2), Twin Block (TB), and Occlus-o-Guide (O-o-G), for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. : Sixty-five patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion were divided into three groups and were analyzed through cephalometric analysis of skeletal, dental, and esthetic variables before and after treatment. The first group of 23 patients (F: 9; M: 14; mean age: 10.3 ± 1.08 years) was treated with FR-2, the second group of 18 patients (F: 8; M: 10; mean age 10.7 ± 1.05 years) was treated with TB, the third group (F: 11; M: 13; mean age: 9.05 ± 0.39 years) of 24 patients was treated with O-o-G. The structural effects of the three devices were compared with a control group generated by the growth variations reported in the cephalometric atlas of Bhatia and Leighton. Esthetic analysis was performed comparing the results of the patients treated with a control group of 20 subjects with mandibular retrognathia and Class II Division 1 malocclusion, not subjected to therapy. : The three devices resulted in a significant increase in mandibular length, with higher results obtained for FR-2 and TB. A statistically significant increase in the IMPA angle was found for the O-o-G group, and a notable reduction of both overjet and overbite was detected in all three groups of treated patients. The esthetic evaluation showed overall more significant results in the TB group, especially with regard to the reduction of facial convexity. The retrusion of the upper lip was on average more significant in the O-o-G group, followed by that in the TB. : All three devices have proven to be effective overall in resolving skeletal changes and improving facial esthetics.

摘要

为了比较三种功能性矫治器(Fränkel-2 矫治器、双板矫治器和 Occlus-o-Guide 矫治器)治疗安氏Ⅱ类错颌的骨骼、牙齿和美学变化,将 65 例安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌患者分为三组,通过治疗前后的头颅侧位片的骨骼、牙齿和美学变量的分析。第一组 23 例患者(F:9;M:14;平均年龄:10.3±1.08 岁)接受 FR-2 治疗,第二组 18 例患者(F:8;M:10;平均年龄:10.7±1.05 岁)接受 TB 治疗,第三组(F:11;M:13;平均年龄:9.05±0.39 岁)的 24 例患者接受 O-o-G 治疗。将三种设备的结构效果与 Bhatia 和 Leighton 头影测量图谱中报告的生长变化生成的对照组进行比较。通过对 20 例下颌后缩安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌患者的治疗结果与未接受治疗的对照组进行美学分析。结果显示:三种矫治器均能显著增加下颌长度,FR-2 和 TB 的效果更为显著。O-o-G 组 IMPA 角显著增加,三组治疗患者的覆盖和覆盖深度均显著减少。美学评估显示,TB 组总体效果更为显著,尤其是在减少面凸度方面。上唇回缩在 O-o-G 组平均更为显著,其次是 TB 组。结论:三种矫治器在解决骨骼变化和改善面部美学方面均有效。