Suppr超能文献

低剂量利伐沙班对亚洲房颤患者的利弊:一项真实世界研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Benefits and Harms of Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies.

作者信息

Qian Jun, Yan Yi-Dan, Yang Sheng-Yan, Zhang Chi, Li Wen-Yan, Gu Zhi-Chun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Gongli Hospital of Pudong New Area, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:642907. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.642907. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Low-dose prescription of rivaroxaban was common among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Asia. However, the benefits and harms of rivaroxaban at a low dosage in Asian patients with AF remains unclear. Accordingly, we aimed to collect and summarize all available evidence to fill this important knowledge gap. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception until February 23, 2021. Eligible retrospective nationwide or health insurance database studies or prospective registration studies that reported efficacy (stroke/systemic embolism), safety (major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding), or other outcomes (myocardial infarction, death) of low-dose rivaroxaban in comparison with warfarin in AF patients were enrolled. Data extraction and study quality assessment were conducted by two authors independently. Low dosing of rivaroxaban (15/10 mg) was defined as the received dose lower than the recommended dose (20 mg) approved in most districts. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was pooled using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different dose regimens. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by sequential elimination of each study from the pool. Since potential effect modifiers (patient demographics, differences of each study, and others) may lead to bias in primacy outcomes, we performed a meta-regression analysis to explore the influence of these factors on the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Totally, 12 studies involving 292,815 Asian patients with AF were included. All studies were detected as low to moderate risk bias. Low-dose rivaroxaban treatment in Asian AF patients was associated with a reduced risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.84, : 57.8%), major bleeding (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62-0.84, : 81.5%), and all-cause death (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73, : 81.7%) when compared with warfarin. Furthermore, consistent results were observed among different dose regimens (10/15/20 mg) in all the clinical outcomes ( > 0.05 for each outcome). Meta-regression analysis failed to detect any potential confounding to impact the primacy outcomes. Insights from the present meta-analysis, we found that low-dose rivaroxaban, even at a dosage of 10 mg daily, was associated with a reduced risk of stroke/SE and bleeding than warfarin in Asian AF patients. However, owing to considerable heterogeneity among included studies, further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

摘要

在亚洲,低剂量利伐沙班处方在房颤(AF)患者中很常见。然而,低剂量利伐沙班在亚洲房颤患者中的益处和危害仍不明确。因此,我们旨在收集和总结所有可用证据,以填补这一重要的知识空白。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以查找从数据库建立至2021年2月23日的相关研究。纳入了符合条件的全国性回顾性或医疗保险数据库研究或前瞻性注册研究,这些研究报告了低剂量利伐沙班与华法林相比在房颤患者中的疗效(中风/全身性栓塞)、安全性(大出血、颅内出血、胃肠道出血)或其他结局(心肌梗死、死亡)。由两名作者独立进行数据提取和研究质量评估。利伐沙班低剂量(15/10毫克)定义为所接受剂量低于大多数地区批准的推荐剂量(20毫克)。使用随机效应模型汇总95%置信区间(95%CI)的风险比(HR)。根据不同剂量方案进行亚组分析。通过从汇总中依次剔除每项研究进行敏感性分析。由于潜在的效应修饰因素(患者人口统计学特征、每项研究的差异等)可能导致主要结局出现偏差,我们进行了荟萃回归分析,以探讨这些因素对主要疗效和安全性结局的影响。总共纳入了12项涉及292815名亚洲房颤患者的研究。所有研究均被检测为低至中度风险偏倚。与华法林相比,亚洲房颤患者使用低剂量利伐沙班治疗与中风/全身性栓塞风险降低(HR:0.76,95%CI:0.70 - 0.84,I²:57.8%)、大出血风险降低(HR:0.72,95%CI:0.62 - 0.84,I²:81.5%)和全因死亡风险降低(HR:0.65,95%CI:0.58 - 0.73,I²:81.7%)相关。此外,在所有临床结局中,不同剂量方案(10/15/20毫克)均观察到一致结果(每项结局的I²>0.05)。荟萃回归分析未发现任何潜在混杂因素影响主要结局。从本荟萃分析中我们发现,在亚洲房颤患者中,低剂量利伐沙班,即使每日剂量为10毫克,与华法林相比,中风/全身性栓塞和出血风险也降低。然而,由于纳入研究之间存在相当大的异质性,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3166/8240755/365b2020b6d9/fphar-12-642907-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验