Liu Lingling, Li Bingning, Wu Yanwen
Beijing Center for Physical & Chemical Analysis, Beijing Food Safety Analysis and Testing Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100094, China.
Se Pu. 2021 Aug;39(8):905-912. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.02011.
To strengthen regulation for mitigating the risk posed by petroleum contaminants in soil, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China has classified petroleum hydrocarbons as a key monitoring item for regulatory contamination monitoring. Petroleum is principally derived from petroleum and synthetic fuels, which contain an extremely high content of hydrocarbon compounds that have varied boiling points. These compounds are chemically classified primarily as saturated and aromatic. Aromatic hydrocarbons are typically highly alkylated monocyclic, bicyclic, and polycyclic, which are more toxic to human and animal life than saturated hydrocarbons. Because of the significant toxicological differences among the various hydrocarbons, it is difficult to accurately assess their environmental toxicity by only determining the total content of petroleum in soil. However, there are no analytical methods for the simultaneous determination of saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons in soil according to Chinese standards. In this study, extraction and purification procedures were completely optimized depending on the matrix of the soil samples. The advanced analytical technique of on-line high performance liquid chromatography-gas chromatography (HPLC-GC) was performed after sample preparation for the simultaneous determination of saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. For the extraction, -hexane/ethanol (1∶1, v/v) was chosen as the extraction solvent. The ratio of solid sample (soil) to the solvent was chosen as 1∶4, and extraction was performed once at room temperature, for 1 h. Water was then added and mixed to remove ethanol from the extracts, and the upper -hexane layer was separated; thus, the petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples were completely extracted. However, the oils and fats in the matrix of the soil sample were also simultaneously extracted. Because of the limited retention capacity of the HPLC column, the presence of oils, fats, and other interferents would affect the subsequent determination of saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons. Therefore, an additional purification step is required before sample injection into the HPLC-GC equipment. In this study, purification was performed using a lab-made silica gel column, which is commonly used for the determination of saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons in food. The purification column was conditioned and eluted with an 8∶2 ratio (v/v) of -hexane to dichloromethane after sample loading. Subsequently, the eluent was concentrated and injected into the HPLC-GC equipment for analysis. The flame ionization detector (FID) is ideal for petroleum hydrocarbons quantification because of its nearly identical responses to all hydrocarbons; hence, with the FID, reference standards are not required for quantification, and internal standards are typically used for quantifying the total hydrocarbon content. In this study, cyclohexylcyclohexane (Cycy) and 2-methylnaphthalene (2-MN) were used as internal standards for determining the saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons, respectively. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of this proposed method was 0.4 mg/kg. Moreover, the suitability of the method was verified by comparing the obtained content against the soil petroleum hydrocarbon standard (SQC-116); the measured value was found to be within the credible interval provided by the standard. The relative error (RE) was 10.6% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.4%, which indicates that the proposed method is accurate and reliable, and the precision meets analytical requirements. Finally, the method was applied to the determination of hydrocarbons in five soil samples from the Beijing area. Saturated hydrocarbons (C-C) were detected in all five samples, with contents ranging from 3.3 to 32.1 mg/kg, while aromatic hydrocarbons (C-C) were detected in four samples, with contents ranging from 0.8 to 4.3 mg/kg. HPLC-GC combines the high selectivity of HPLC with the high separation efficiency of GC, and as demonstrated in this study, can be used for the simultaneous determination of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. The source of hydrocarbon contamination can also be preliminarily identified by chromatographic analysis.
为加强土壤中石油类污染物风险管控,生态环境部已将石油烃列为土壤污染常规监测的重点项目。石油主要来源于石油和合成燃料,其烃类化合物含量极高,且沸点各异。这些化合物主要化学分类为饱和烃和芳烃。芳烃通常为高度烷基化的单环、双环和多环芳烃,相比饱和烃,对人类和动物生命毒性更大。由于各类烃类在毒理学上存在显著差异,仅通过测定土壤中石油类总量难以准确评估其环境毒性。然而,我国尚无同时测定土壤中饱和烃和芳烃的分析方法标准。本研究根据土壤样品基质对萃取和净化程序进行了全面优化。在样品制备后,采用先进的在线高效液相色谱 - 气相色谱(HPLC - GC)技术同时测定土壤中的饱和烃和芳烃。萃取时,选用正己烷/乙醇(1∶1,v/v)作为萃取溶剂。固体样品(土壤)与溶剂的比例为1∶4,在室温下萃取1次,每次1小时。然后加水混合以去除萃取液中的乙醇,分离出上层正己烷层,从而将样品中的石油烃完全萃取出来。然而,土壤样品基质中的油脂也同时被萃取出来。由于HPLC柱的保留容量有限,油脂和其他干扰物的存在会影响后续饱和烃和芳烃的测定。因此,在将样品注入HPLC - GC设备之前需要额外的净化步骤。本研究采用实验室自制的硅胶柱进行净化,该硅胶柱常用于食品中饱和烃和芳烃的测定。在样品上样后,用正己烷与二氯甲烷体积比为8∶2的混合液对净化柱进行活化和洗脱。随后,将洗脱液浓缩并注入HPLC - GC设备进行分析。火焰离子化检测器(FID)对石油烃定量分析较为理想,因为它对所有烃类的响应几乎相同;因此,使用FID进行定量分析无需标准物质,通常采用内标法来定量总烃含量。本研究分别采用环己基环己烷(Cycy)和2 - 甲基萘(2 - MN)作为测定饱和烃和芳烃的内标物。该方法的定量限(LOQ)为0.4 mg/kg。此外,通过将测定结果与土壤石油烃标准物质(SQC - 116)对比,验证了该方法的适用性;测定值在标准物质给出的置信区间内。相对误差(RE)为10.6%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为1.4%,表明该方法准确可靠,精密度满足分析要求。最后,将该方法应用于北京地区五个土壤样品中烃类的测定。所有五个样品均检测到饱和烃(C - C),含量范围为3.3至32.1 mg/kg,四个样品检测到芳烃(C - C),含量范围为0.8至4.3 mg/kg。HPLC - GC结合了HPLC的高选择性和GC的高分离效率,如本研究所示,可用于同时测定土壤中的饱和烃和芳烃。通过色谱分析还可初步识别烃类污染物的来源。