Suppr超能文献

关于替代计量学的批判性综述:我们能否衡量社会影响因子?

A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?

作者信息

García-Villar Cristina

机构信息

Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Ana de Viya Avenue, nº 21. 11009, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2021 Jul 2;12(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01033-2.

Abstract

Altmetrics measure the digital attention received by a research output. They allow us to gauge the immediate social impact of an article by taking real-time measurements of how it circulates in the Internet. While there are several companies offering attention scores, the most extensive are Altmetric.com (Altmetric Attention Score-AAS) and Plum X (Plum Print). As this is an emerging topic, many medical specialities have tried to establish if there is a relationship between an article's altmetric data and the citations it subsequently receives. The results have varied depending on the research field. In radiology, the social network most used is Twitter and the subspeciality with the highest AAS is neuroimaging. This article will review the process involved from the start when an article is published through to finally obtaining its altmetric score. It will also address the relationship between altmetrics and more traditional approaches focusing on citations in radiology and will discuss the advantages and limitations of these new impact indicators.

摘要

替代计量学衡量研究成果所获得的数字关注度。它们使我们能够通过实时测量一篇文章在互联网上的传播方式来评估其即时社会影响。虽然有几家公司提供关注度得分,但最全面的是Altmetric.com(替代计量关注度得分 - AAS)和Plum X(Plum Print)。由于这是一个新兴话题,许多医学专业都试图确定一篇文章的替代计量数据与其随后获得的引用之间是否存在关系。结果因研究领域而异。在放射学中,最常用的社交网络是推特,AAS最高的亚专业是神经影像学。本文将回顾从文章发表开始到最终获得其替代计量得分所涉及的过程。它还将探讨替代计量学与放射学中更传统的关注引用方法之间的关系,并讨论这些新的影响指标的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb17/8253863/caeb14badeff/13244_2021_1033_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验