Trouw Nutrition R&D, PO Box 299, 3800 AG, Amersfoort, the Netherlands; Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Trouw Nutrition R&D, PO Box 299, 3800 AG, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Oct;104(10):10714-10726. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20219. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Limited research with growing ruminants indicates that oscillating (OS) dietary crude protein (CP) concentration may improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Our aim was to determine if a total mixed ration (TMR) based on OS CP (48-h phases of 13.4% and 16.5% CP, respectively) would increase NUE of lactating dairy cows compared with a static CP TMR (ST; 14.9% CP). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 50 cows [150 ± 61 (mean ± SD) d in milk]. Cows were blocked by parity, days in milk, and milk protein yield. On average, diets were equal in composition over the total experiment. Cows were milked twice daily, and 8 milk samples were collected in each 4-d period. Each 48 h of low-CP (LP) and high-CP (HP) TMR offered to OS cows corresponded to milk collected at milkings 1 to 4 and 5 to 8, respectively. Dry matter intake (mean = 25.5 kg/d for both treatment groups); yields of milk (mean = 31.5 kg/d for both treatment groups), protein, fat, lactose, and fat- and protein-corrected milk (mean = 33.6 kg/d for both treatment groups); and milk concentration of protein, fat, and lactose did not differ between treatments. However, milk urea concentration was higher for OS compared with ST (12.2 vs. 11.3 mg/dL). Body weight, body condition score, NUE, and feed efficiency were unaffected by OS. Apparent total-tract digestibility of dry matter (695 vs. 677 g/kg), organic matter (714 vs. 697 g/kg), CP (624 vs. 594 g/kg), neutral detergent fiber (530 vs. 499 g/kg), and starch (976 vs. 973 g/kg) were higher for OS than for ST cows. Cows in OS responded transiently, and regression analysis of differences within block over time revealed changes in yield of milk (-531 g/d), milk protein (-25.6 g/d), and milk lactose (-16.7 g/d) in LP. Opposite effects were observed for yield of milk (+612 g/d), milk protein (+28.8 g/d), and milk lactose (+28.0 g/d) during HP. Changes in concentrations of milk protein (-0.050%/d), lactose (+0.030%/d), and urea (-3.0 mg/dL per day) during LP, and in milk lactose (-0.024%/d) and urea (+4.3 mg/dL per day) during HP, were observed. Milk yield, lactose yield, and protein yield were lower for OS than ST cows at the last milking of LP and at the first milking of HP. Milk urea concentration did not show such a lag and was lower in the last 2 milkings of LP, and higher in the last 3 milkings of HP, in OS compared with ST cows. Overall, performance and NUE were unaffected by OS treatment, but apparent total-tract digestibility and milk urea concentration increased, and transient effects on milk yield and composition occurred in OS cows.
针对生长反刍动物的有限研究表明,波动(OS)日粮粗蛋白(CP)浓度可能提高氮利用效率(NUE)。我们的目的是确定基于 OS CP 的全混合日粮(TMR)(分别为 48 小时的 13.4%和 16.5% CP)是否会比静态 CP TMR(ST;14.9% CP)提高泌乳奶牛的 NUE。该实验采用随机完全区组设计,有 50 头奶牛[产奶 150 ± 61(均值 ± SD)天]。根据胎次、产奶天数和乳蛋白产量对奶牛进行分组。平均而言,在整个实验期间,日粮在组成上是相等的。奶牛每天挤奶 2 次,每个 4 天期采集 8 个乳样。OS 奶牛的低 CP(LP)和高 CP(HP)TMR 每 48 小时提供一次,分别对应于第 1 至 4 次和第 5 至 8 次挤奶的乳样。干物质摄入量(两组治疗组均值为 25.5 kg/d);乳产量(两组治疗组均值为 31.5 kg/d)、蛋白质、脂肪、乳糖和脂肪及蛋白质校正乳(两组治疗组均值为 33.6 kg/d);以及乳蛋白、脂肪和乳糖浓度在两组治疗组之间没有差异。然而,OS 组的乳尿素浓度高于 ST 组(12.2 比 11.3 mg/dL)。OS 对体重、体况评分、NUE 和饲料效率没有影响。干物质(695 比 677 g/kg)、有机物(714 比 697 g/kg)、CP(624 比 594 g/kg)、中性洗涤剂纤维(530 比 499 g/kg)和淀粉(976 比 973 g/kg)的表观全肠道消化率更高OS 比 ST 奶牛。OS 奶牛出现短暂反应,时间块内差异的回归分析显示 LP 中乳产量(-531 g/d)、乳蛋白(-25.6 g/d)和乳乳糖(-16.7 g/d)的变化。在 HP 期间观察到相反的效果,乳产量(+612 g/d)、乳蛋白(+28.8 g/d)和乳乳糖(+28.0 g/d)。在 LP 期间观察到乳蛋白(-0.050%/d)、乳糖(+0.030%/d)和尿素(每天 3.0 mg/dL)浓度的变化,以及在 HP 期间乳乳糖(-0.024%/d)和尿素(每天 4.3 mg/dL)浓度的变化。与 ST 奶牛相比,OS 奶牛在 LP 的最后一次挤奶和 HP 的第一次挤奶时,乳产量、乳糖产量和蛋白产量较低。与 ST 奶牛相比,OS 奶牛的乳尿素浓度在 LP 的最后两次挤奶中没有滞后,且较低,而在 HP 的最后三次挤奶中,乳尿素浓度较高。总的来说,OS 处理对奶牛的生产性能和 NUE 没有影响,但表观全肠道消化率和乳尿素浓度增加,OS 奶牛的乳产量和成分出现短暂变化。