Andrade-Talavera Yuniesky, Rodríguez-Moreno Antonio
Laboratory of Cellular Neuroscience and Plasticity, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2021 Jun 17;14:696476. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.696476. eCollection 2021.
Brain plasticity is widely accepted as the core neurophysiological basis of memory and is generally defined by activity-dependent changes in synaptic efficacy, such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). By using diverse induction protocols like high-frequency stimulation (HFS) or spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), such crucial cognition-relevant plastic processes are shown to be impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In AD, the severity of the cognitive impairment also correlates with the level of disruption of neuronal network dynamics. Currently under debate, the named amyloid hypothesis points to amyloid-beta peptide 1-42 (Aβ42) as the trigger of the functional deviations underlying cognitive impairment in AD. However, there are missing functional mechanistic data that comprehensively dissect the early subtle changes that lead to synaptic dysfunction and subsequent neuronal network collapse in AD. The convergence of the study of both, mechanisms underlying brain plasticity, and neuronal network dynamics, may represent the most efficient approach to address the early triggering and aberrant mechanisms underlying the progressive clinical cognitive impairment in AD. Here we comment on the emerging integrative roles of brain plasticity and network oscillations in AD research and on the future perspectives of research in this field.
脑可塑性被广泛认为是记忆的核心神经生理学基础,通常由突触效能的活动依赖性变化来定义,如长时程增强(LTP)和长时程抑制(LTD)。通过使用不同的诱导方案,如高频刺激(HFS)或尖峰时间依赖可塑性(STDP),已表明这些与认知相关的关键可塑性过程在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中受损。在AD中,认知障碍的严重程度也与神经网络动态破坏的程度相关。目前存在争议的淀粉样蛋白假说指出,淀粉样β肽1-42(Aβ42)是AD中认知障碍潜在功能偏差的触发因素。然而,缺乏全面剖析导致AD中突触功能障碍及随后神经网络崩溃的早期细微变化的功能机制数据。对脑可塑性机制和神经网络动态的研究相结合,可能是解决AD中进行性临床认知障碍的早期触发和异常机制的最有效方法。在此,我们评论脑可塑性和网络振荡在AD研究中新兴的综合作用以及该领域研究的未来前景。