Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 16;12:655608. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.655608. eCollection 2021.
It remains controversial whether patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) benefit from total thyroidectomy (TT) or thyroid lobectomy (TL). We aimed to investigate the impact of extent of surgery on the prognosis of patients with unilateral PTMC. Patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves with propensity score matching. Of 31167 PTMC patients enrolled, 22.2% and 77.8% of which underwent TL and TT, respectively. Patients with TT were more likely to be younger, females, present tumors of multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM), distant metastasis, and receive radioactive iodine (RAI) compared with those receiving TL. The multivariate Cox regression model showed that TT was not associated with an improved CSS and OS compared with TL with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.53 (0.25-1.12) and 0.86 (0.72-1.04), respectively. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier curves further confirmed the similar survival between TL and TT after propensity score matching. The subgroup analysis showed that TT was associated with better CSS for patients < 55 years, those with tumors of gross extrathyroidal extension, CLNM (N1b), and cases not receiving RAI with HR 95% CI of 0.13 (0.02-0.81), 0.12 (0.02-0.66), 0.11 (0.02-0.64) and 0.36 (0.13-0.90), respectively. TT predicted a trend of better OS for patients with N1b and distant metastasis after adjustment. In addition, TT was associated with better CSS than TL for patients with risk factors like N1b combined with gross extrathyroidal extension, and/or multifocality after matching. In conclusion, TL may be enough for low-risk PTMC patients. TT may improve the prognosis of unilateral PTMC patients with 2 or more risk clinicopathologic factors like CLNM, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension and a younger age compared with TL.
对于患有甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)的患者,甲状腺全切除术(TT)或甲状腺叶切除术(TL)是否有益仍存在争议。我们旨在研究手术范围对单侧 PTMC 患者预后的影响。患者数据来自 2004 年至 2015 年的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库。通过 Cox 回归和倾向评分匹配的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。在纳入的 31167 例 PTMC 患者中,分别有 22.2%和 77.8%接受了 TL 和 TT。与接受 TL 的患者相比,接受 TT 的患者更年轻、女性、多灶性肿瘤、甲状腺外延伸、颈部淋巴结转移(CLNM)、远处转移和接受放射性碘(RAI)治疗的可能性更高。多变量 Cox 回归模型显示,与 TL 相比,TT 并未改善 CSS 和 OS,风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 0.53(0.25-1.12)和 0.86(0.72-1.04)。此外,倾向评分匹配后的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线进一步证实了 TL 和 TT 之间的相似生存。亚组分析显示,对于年龄<55 岁、肿瘤大体甲状腺外延伸、CLNM(N1b)和未接受 RAI 的患者,TT 与更好的 CSS 相关,HR 95%CI 分别为 0.13(0.02-0.81)、0.12(0.02-0.66)、0.11(0.02-0.64)和 0.36(0.13-0.90)。调整后,TT 预测 N1b 和远处转移患者的 OS 趋势更好。此外,对于 N1b 合并大体甲状腺外延伸和/或多灶性等危险因素的患者,TT 与 TL 相比,CSS 更好。总之,TL 可能足以用于低危 PTMC 患者。与 TL 相比,TT 可能会改善 2 个或更多风险临床病理因素(如 CLNM、多灶性、甲状腺外延伸和年龄较小)的单侧 PTMC 患者的预后。