Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 18;9:681971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.681971. eCollection 2021.
To analyze the associations between favorable physical and psychosocial work factors and health behavior among healthcare employees (nurses and care assistants) with health complaints. The study was based on seven iterations (2001-2013) of a biennial Swedish work environment survey linked with data from public registers. In all, 7,180 healthcare employees, aged 16-64 years, who had reported health complaints, were included. Health behavior was operationalized through four combinations of sickness absence (SA) and sickness presence (SP): 'good health behavior' (Low SP/Low SA), 'recovery behavior' (Low SP/High SA), 'risk behavior' (High SP/Low SA), and 'poor health behavior' (High SP/High SA). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by multinomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals (CI). After adjusting for socio-demographic factors, those who rarely worked in strenuous postures had an increased probability of having 'good health behavior' (OR range: nurses 1.72-2.02; care assistants 1.46-1.75). Those who rarely experienced high job demands had increased odds for having 'good health behavior' (OR: nurses 1.81; OR range: care assistants 1.67-2.13), while having good job control was found to be related to 'good health behavior' only among care assistants (OR range 1.30-1.68). In the full model, after also considering differences in health, none of the work environment indicators affected 'good health behavior' among nursing professionals. Among care assistants, rarely having heavy physical work and having low psychosocial demands remained significantly associated with 'good health behavior' (OR range: 1.24-1.58) and 'recovery behavior' (OR range: 1.33-1.70). No associations were found between favorable work environment factors and 'risk behavior' among the two groups of employees. However, positive assessments of the work situation were associated with 'good health behavior,' even after controlling for all confounders for both groups (OR range: 1.43-2.69). 'Good health behavior' and 'recovery behavior' among care assistants were associated with favorable physical and psychosocial working conditions even when health was considered. This implies that reduced sickness presence and sickness absence among care assistants can be achieved through improved physical and psychosocial working conditions.
分析有利的物理和心理社会工作因素与有健康抱怨的医疗保健员工(护士和护理助理)健康行为之间的关联。该研究基于瑞典工作环境调查的七个迭代(2001-2013 年),与公共登记处的数据相关联。共有 7180 名年龄在 16-64 岁之间、报告有健康抱怨的医疗保健员工被纳入研究。健康行为通过病假(SA)和病假(SP)的四种组合来操作化:“良好的健康行为”(低 SP/低 SA)、“康复行为”(低 SP/高 SA)、“风险行为”(高 SP/低 SA)和“不良健康行为”(高 SP/高 SA)。使用 95%置信区间(CI)的多项逻辑回归计算了优势比(OR)。在调整了社会人口因素后,很少从事剧烈姿势工作的人具有较高的“良好健康行为”可能性(OR 范围:护士 1.72-2.02;护理助理 1.46-1.75)。很少经历高工作要求的人具有较高的“良好健康行为”几率(OR:护士 1.81;OR 范围:护理助理 1.67-2.13),而良好的工作控制仅被发现与护理助理的“良好健康行为”相关(OR 范围 1.30-1.68)。在全模型中,在考虑到健康差异后,工作环境指标均不影响护理专业人员的“良好健康行为”。在护理助理中,很少进行重体力工作和低心理社会需求仍然与“良好健康行为”(OR 范围:1.24-1.58)和“康复行为”(OR 范围:1.33-1.70)显著相关。在两组员工中,有利的工作环境因素与“风险行为”之间均无关联。然而,即使在考虑到两组的所有混杂因素后,对工作情况的积极评估仍与“良好健康行为”相关(OR 范围:1.43-2.69)。即使考虑到健康状况,护理助理的“良好健康行为”和“康复行为”仍与有利的生理和心理社会工作条件相关。这意味着通过改善生理和心理社会工作条件,可以减少护理助理的病假和缺勤。