Scruggs R R, George M C, Raney D L, Miller D L
Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill 27514.
J Dent Educ. 1988 Feb;52(2):102-7.
This study examines how teaching performance is evaluated in U.S. dental schools. Respondents to the mailed survey were dental school deans. Most schools formally evaluate teaching through student evaluation, yet most deans agreed that evaluation should include input from students and peers. Features that were considered most important in an evaluation program included the provision of a feedback mechanism, the inclusion of faculty input, and a standardization of the evaluation system. The majority of schools provide a program to enhance teaching skills; responsibility for the program varied from the department chairperson to the individual faculty member. More than half of the deans indicated that research productivity can "outweigh" teaching skills in promotion and tenure decisions. The results indicate that dental school deans expect excellence in teaching, but leave doubt as to how faculty members are to gain expertise in this realm of their profession.
本研究探讨了美国牙科院校如何评估教学表现。邮寄调查问卷的受访者为牙科院校院长。大多数院校通过学生评估对教学进行正式评估,但大多数院长一致认为评估应包括学生和同行的意见。评估方案中被认为最重要的特征包括提供反馈机制、纳入教师意见以及评估系统的标准化。大多数院校提供提升教学技能的项目;该项目的负责人从系主任到个别教师不等。超过半数的院长表示,在晋升和终身教职决定中,研究成果可能“比”教学技能更重要。结果表明,牙科院校院长期望教学卓越,但对于教师如何在其专业领域获得这方面的专业知识仍存疑问。