Osuji Thearis A, Macias Mayra, McMullen Carmit, Haupt Eric, Mittman Brian, Mularski Richard A, Wang Susan E, Werch Henry, Nguyen Huong Q
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation, Pasadena, California, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Oct 6;1(1):221-226. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0074. eCollection 2020.
Despite the increasing use and acceptance of technology in health care, there is limited evidence on the usefulness and appropriate use of telehealth in home-based palliative care (HBPC). As part of the process evaluation of a pragmatic trial of video visits in HBPC, we assessed clinician experience with video visit implementation. We assessed clinicians' experiences with and perception of the usefulness and appropriateness of video visits using anonymous surveys and brief qualitative interviews with a subset of survey participants. Qualitative analyses were guided by sociotechnical frameworks that emphasize technology's "value proposition" for its end users as being key to adoption. Clinicians (36 physicians and 48 registered nurses) generally had favorable attitudes toward video visits and telehealth. Respondents felt confident in the skills needed to make their role in video visits successful. Clinicians were neutral on whether video visits were useful for their practice or enhanced the patient-caregiver experience. Clinicians found video visits to be most appropriate for follow-up care (as opposed to start of care). The interviews yielded two themes that complemented the survey findings: (1) factors enhancing the value proposition (positive responses from patients and families and convenience) and (2) factors diminishing the value proposition (issues related to the technology and scheduling). Our findings provide insights into clinicians' experiences with implementing remote video physician consultations, facilitated by a nurse in the patient's home in the pre-COVID-19 era. Clinician views about video visits may have shifted with the pandemic, which occurred after our data collection was complete. Clinical Trials Registration No. NCT#03694431.
尽管技术在医疗保健中的应用和接受度不断提高,但关于远程医疗在家居姑息治疗(HBPC)中的实用性和合理使用的证据有限。作为HBPC视频问诊实用试验过程评估的一部分,我们评估了临床医生实施视频问诊的经验。我们通过匿名调查以及对部分调查参与者进行简短的定性访谈,评估了临床医生对视频问诊的实用性和适用性的经验及看法。定性分析以社会技术框架为指导,该框架强调技术对其最终用户的“价值主张”是采用的关键。临床医生(36名医生和48名注册护士)总体上对视频问诊和远程医疗持积极态度。受访者对成功履行其在视频问诊中的职责所需的技能充满信心。临床医生对视频问诊对其业务是否有用或是否改善了患者 - 护理人员体验持中立态度。临床医生发现视频问诊最适合用于随访护理(而非护理开始阶段)。访谈产生了两个与调查结果互补主题:(1)增强价值主张的因素(患者和家属的积极反馈以及便利性)和(2)削弱价值主张的因素(与技术和安排相关的问题)。我们的研究结果为临床医生在COVID - 19大流行前在患者家中由护士协助实施远程视频医生咨询的经验提供了见解。临床医生对视频问诊的看法可能随着大流行而发生了变化,而大流行发生在我们的数据收集完成之后。临床试验注册号:NCT#03694431