Professor Dr Shohael Mahmud Arafat, Professor & Chairman, Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh; E-mail:
Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Jul;30(3):704-709.
Persistent lymphadenopathy with or without fever is often a diagnostic challenge to the physician which are usually caused by infection like tuberculosis, hematological malignancy (lymphoma, leukemia), connective tissue diseases (SLE, RA, Sjogren's syndrome etc.), sarcoidosis, storage diseases, drugs (like phenytoin) in Bangladesh. To establish the cause of lymphadenopathy, we need to do a good number of investigations including invasive tests like FNAC or histopathology of the involved lymph node. In many instances these are not possible due to unavailability or cost. But for last few years the adenosine deaminase is an enzyme involved in purine catabolism and its significance in the diagnosis of tuberculosis has been demonstrated by many studies. In addition to tuberculosis, elevated serum adenosine deaminase has also been found in lymphoma, sarcoidosis and some connective tissue diseases. The study was intended to assess if there are any significant diagnostic difference in the level of elevated adenosine deaminase between tubercular and different types of non tubercular lymphadenopathy. It included 68 patients, equally divided into two groups, tuberculous lymphadenitis and non-tuberculous lymphadenopathy. Epitheloid granuloma with caseation necrosis in biopsy or FNAC was taken as case definition of tuberculous lymphadenitis. Causes of non-tuberculous lymphadenopathy were established on the basis of clinical findings, laboratory investigations and histopathological diagnosis of biopsy or FNAc materials. This cross-sectional observational study was done in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh over a period of one year and participants of 18 years and above of both genders were included as per consecutive sampling technique. Serum ADA concentrations were estimated by enzymatic method. Mean serum ADA concentration was 25.52±7.11 in tuberculous lymphadenitis and in non-tuberculous lymphadenopathy patients it was 27.29±15.91U/L with no significant difference (p=0.480). The non-tuberculous lymphadenopathy group consisted of Hodgkin disease (n=9), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=10), sarcoidosis (n=2), reactive lymphadenitis (n=9) and other lymphadenopathy group (n=4) (that consisted one case of each of follicular hyperplasia, adult Still disease, sinus histiocytosis and Castleman's disease). The mean ADA of these groups was 32.77±13.14U/L, 46.40±46.10U/L, 13.94±2.81U/L and 21.75±3.17U/L respectively. Tuberculous lymphadenitis patients had significantly higher serum ADA than persistent reactive lymphadenitis. On the other hand, there were statistically significant elevation of serum ADA in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and sarcoidosis than in tuberculous lymphadenitis.
在孟加拉国,伴有或不伴有发热的持续性淋巴结病常常是医生面临的诊断难题,通常由感染引起,如结核病、血液系统恶性肿瘤(淋巴瘤、白血病)、结缔组织疾病(SLE、RA、干燥综合征等)、结节病、贮积病、药物(如苯妥英)。为了确定淋巴结病的病因,我们需要进行大量的检查,包括细针穿刺活检或受累淋巴结的组织病理学等有创检查。在许多情况下,由于无法获得或成本问题,这些检查是不可能进行的。但在过去几年中,腺苷脱氨酶是一种参与嘌呤分解代谢的酶,许多研究已经证明其在结核病诊断中的意义。除了结核病外,血清腺苷脱氨酶升高也可见于淋巴瘤、结节病和一些结缔组织疾病。本研究旨在评估结核性和非结核性淋巴结病患者中升高的腺苷脱氨酶水平是否存在显著的诊断差异。研究纳入了 68 名患者,平均分为两组,结核性淋巴结炎和非结核性淋巴结病。活检或细针穿刺抽吸物中出现干酪样坏死的上皮样肉芽肿被视为结核性淋巴结炎的病例定义。非结核性淋巴结病的病因是基于临床发现、实验室检查和活检或 FNAc 材料的组织病理学诊断确定的。这是一项在孟加拉国达卡的 Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib 医科大学(BSMMU)进行的横断面观察性研究,研究时间为一年,纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上的男女参与者,采用连续抽样技术。血清 ADA 浓度采用酶法测定。结核性淋巴结炎患者的血清 ADA 平均浓度为 25.52±7.11U/L,而非结核性淋巴结病患者为 27.29±15.91U/L,差异无统计学意义(p=0.480)。非结核性淋巴结病组包括霍奇金病(n=9)、非霍奇金淋巴瘤(n=10)、结节病(n=2)、反应性淋巴结炎(n=9)和其他淋巴结病组(n=4)(包括滤泡性增生、成人斯蒂尔病、窦组织细胞增生症和 Castleman 病各 1 例)。这些组的平均 ADA 分别为 32.77±13.14U/L、46.40±46.10U/L、13.94±2.81U/L和 21.75±3.17U/L。结核性淋巴结炎患者的血清 ADA 明显高于持续性反应性淋巴结炎患者。另一方面,非霍奇金淋巴瘤和结节病患者的血清 ADA 升高有统计学意义,高于结核性淋巴结炎患者。