A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.

Xeroradiographs and conventional film radiographs (D- and E-speed) were compared in a clinical study with the use of 1 complete-mouth radiographs for (1) the presence of interproximal caries and (2) the determination of the depth of interproximal caries with the use of 200 tooth surfaces. In addition, an analysis of correct classification rates making a comparison of the same techniques was conducted. The results with the use of ROC analysis indicated that when a comparison was made of xeroradiography and D- and E-speed film, all techniques were equally useful. A broad range of observer ROC area values was found, indicating that diagnostic performance varies greatly with observer. The results of the diagnostic decisions made on carious surfaces versus noncarious surfaces indicated that all techniques tested were similar: 90% correct for noncarious surfaces and 77% correct for carious surfaces.