Institute for General Kinesiology and Exercise Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Sep;22(9):1315-1325. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1953155. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Among the many factors that determine top athletic performance, little is known about the contribution of the brain. With the present study, we aimed to uncover aspects of this role by examining modulatory differences in brain processing as a function of expertise and task complexity in table tennis. For this purpose, 28 right-handed volunteers (14 experts and 14 novices) performed two table tennis strokes in a standardized manner. Hemodynamic response alterations reflecting neuronal activation were recorded during task execution using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and analyzed within and between groups. Our results showed localized activation patterns in motor areas (primary motor cortex (M1), premotor cortex (PMC), and inferior parietal cortex (IPC)) for experts and novices. Compared to novices, experts completed more table tennis strokes and showed a significant increase in hemodynamic response alterations in channels corresponding to motor areas. Furthermore, we found significant correlations between the number of strokes and hemodynamic response magnitudes in individual channels of M1, PMC, and IPC. Taken together, our findings show that table tennis performance is accompanied by extensive activation of M1, PMC, and IPC. Furthermore, the observed difference in behavioral performance between experts and novices was associated with increased activation in M1, PMC, and IPC. We postulate that these differences in brain processing between experts and novices potentially imply modulatory distinctions related to increased movement speed or frequency but may also reflect an increased task familiarity of the experts.
在决定顶尖运动员表现的众多因素中,大脑的贡献鲜为人知。通过本研究,我们旨在通过检查乒乓球运动中专业知识和任务复杂性的脑处理调节差异来揭示这一作用的各个方面。为此,我们招募了 28 名右利手志愿者(14 名专家和 14 名新手),以标准化的方式进行了两种乒乓球击球动作。在任务执行过程中,使用功能近红外光谱 (fNIRS) 记录反映神经元激活的血液动力学反应变化,并在组内和组间进行分析。我们的结果显示,专家和新手的运动区(初级运动皮层 (M1)、运动前皮层 (PMC) 和下顶叶皮层 (IPC))出现局部激活模式。与新手相比,专家完成的乒乓球击球次数更多,在对应于运动区的通道中血液动力学反应变化显著增加。此外,我们还发现 M1、PMC 和 IPC 个体通道的击球次数和血液动力学反应幅度之间存在显著相关性。总之,我们的研究结果表明,乒乓球表现伴随着 M1、PMC 和 IPC 的广泛激活。此外,专家和新手之间在行为表现上的差异与 M1、PMC 和 IPC 的激活增加有关。我们推测,专家和新手之间的大脑处理差异可能暗示与运动速度或频率增加相关的调节差异,但也可能反映出专家对任务的熟悉度增加。