Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of 5th Internal Medicine with Endocrinology, Rheumatology and Gerontology with Outpatient Department, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Jan;46(1):149-153. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0267. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Insulin replacement in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) needs intensified treatment, which can either be performed by multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). This retrospective analysis of a real-world scenario aimed to evaluate whether glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factors could be controlled with CSII outclass MDI as suggested by recent evidence. Data from patients with either insulin pump (n=68) or injection (n=224) therapy at an Austrian tertiary care centre were analysed between January 2016 and December 2017. There were no significant differences with regard to the latest glycosylated hemoglobin, cardiovascular risk factor control or diabetes-associated late complications. Hypoglycaemia was less frequent (P<0.001), sensor-augmented therapy was more common (P=0.003) and mean body mass index (BMI) was higher (P=0.002) with CSII treatment. This retrospective analysis of real-world data in T1DM did not demonstrate the superiority of insulin pump treatment with regard to glycaemic control or cardiovascular risk factor control.
1 型糖尿病(T1DM)的胰岛素替代治疗需要强化治疗,可通过多次皮下注射(MDI)或连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)来实现。本回顾性分析旨在评估在真实情况下,血糖和心血管危险因素是否可以通过 CSII 控制优于最近证据表明的 MDI。对 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月在奥地利三级护理中心接受胰岛素泵(n=68)或注射(n=224)治疗的患者的数据进行了分析。在最近的糖化血红蛋白、心血管危险因素控制或与糖尿病相关的晚期并发症方面,两组没有显著差异。CSII 治疗的低血糖发生率较低(P<0.001),传感器增强治疗更常见(P=0.003),平均体重指数(BMI)更高(P=0.002)。本对 T1DM 真实世界数据的回顾性分析并未表明胰岛素泵治疗在血糖控制或心血管危险因素控制方面具有优越性。