Suppr超能文献

医疗器械中含钴合金或职业环境中钴的致癌性评估:来自已发表的流行病学研究的总体癌症风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Carcinogenic assessment of cobalt-containing alloys in medical devices or cobalt in occupational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of overall cancer risk from published epidemiologic studies.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson, 410 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Johnson & Johnson, 410 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;125:104987. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104987. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

Abstract

In 2020, the European Commission up-classified pure cobalt metal to a Category 1B hazard, based primarily on data from rodent inhalation carcinogenicity studies of metallic cobalt. The European Commission review did not evaluate cobalt-containing alloys in medical devices, which have very different properties vs. pure cobalt metal and did not include a systematic epidemiologic review. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published, peer-reviewed epidemiologic studies evaluating the association between overall cancer risk and exposure to orthopedic implants containing cobalt alloys or cobalt particulates in occupational settings. Study-specific estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Analyses included 20 papers on orthopedic implants and 10 occupational cohort papers (~1 million individuals). The meta-analysis summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) for overall cancer risk were 1.00 (0.96-1.04) overall and 0.97 (0.94-1.00) among high-quality studies. Results were also similar in analyses stratified by type of exposure/data sources (occupational cohort, implant registry or database), comparators (general or implant population), cancer incidence or mortality, follow-up duration (latency period), and study precision. In conclusion, meta-analysis found no association between exposure to orthopedic implants containing cobalt alloys or cobalt particulates in occupational settings and overall cancer risk, including an analysis of studies directly comparing metal-on-metal vs. non-metal-on-metal implants.

摘要

2020 年,欧盟委员会根据啮齿动物金属钴吸入致癌性研究的数据,将纯钴金属升级为 1B 类危害。欧盟委员会的审查没有评估医疗器械中的含钴合金,这些合金与纯钴金属具有非常不同的特性,也没有进行系统的流行病学审查。我们对已发表的同行评议的流行病学研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,评估了职业环境中含钴合金或钴颗粒的骨科植入物暴露与总体癌症风险之间的关联。使用随机效应模型对研究特异性估计值进行了汇总。分析包括 20 篇关于骨科植入物的论文和 10 篇职业队列论文(约 100 万人)。总体癌症风险的荟萃分析汇总估计值(95%置信区间)为 1.00(0.96-1.04),高质量研究为 0.97(0.94-1.00)。根据暴露/数据来源类型(职业队列、植入物登记处或数据库)、对照(一般人群或植入物人群)、癌症发病率或死亡率、随访时间(潜伏期)和研究精度进行分层分析,结果也相似。总之,荟萃分析发现职业环境中含钴合金或钴颗粒的骨科植入物暴露与总体癌症风险之间没有关联,包括对直接比较金属对金属与非金属对金属植入物的研究的分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验