Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan;
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jul;41(7):3643-3648. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15154.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To clarify the risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with GnP therapy, gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), we compared CINV between GEM and GnP therapy.
Patients who had received an initial course of GEM and GnP therapy were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the incidence of nausea, and secondary endpoints were the incidence of vomiting and rescue. In addition, the association between nausea and combination therapy with GEM and nab-PTX was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for covariates. All patients received anti-cancer drugs under guideline-consistent, low-risk antiemetic measures.
Data from 105 patients were analyzed (GEM group, 44 patients; GnP group, 61 patients). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and rescue did not significantly differ between the two groups during the acute, delayed or overall periods. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that combination therapy with GEM and nab-PTX was not significantly associated with nausea compared to GEM alone.
Under guideline-consistent, low-risk antiemetic measures, GnP therapy-induced nausea and vomiting can be controlled similarly to when induced by GEM.
背景/目的:为了阐明 GnP 治疗(吉西他滨[GEM]联合 nab-紫杉醇[nab-PTX])引起的化疗所致恶心和呕吐(CINV)的风险,我们比较了 GEM 和 GnP 治疗之间的 CINV。
入组了接受初始 GEM 和 GnP 治疗的患者。主要终点是恶心的发生率,次要终点是呕吐和解救的发生率。此外,通过多变量逻辑回归分析评估了 GEM 和 nab-PTX 联合治疗与恶心之间的相关性,并对协变量进行了调整。所有患者均在指南一致的低风险止吐措施下接受抗癌药物治疗。
对 105 例患者的数据进行了分析(GEM 组 44 例;GnP 组 61 例)。两组在急性期、延迟期或总期间恶心、呕吐和解救的发生率无显著差异。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,与单独使用 GEM 相比,GEM 和 nab-PTX 的联合治疗与恶心无显著相关性。
在指南一致的低风险止吐措施下,GnP 治疗引起的恶心和呕吐可以得到与 GEM 相似的控制。