白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗胰腺癌可提高生存率。

Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

机构信息

From the Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, and Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center, Scottsdale - both in Arizona (D.D.V.H., R.K.R.); Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (T.E.); Arena Oncology Associates, Lake Success (F.P.A.), and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (W.W.M.) - both in New York; University of Washington, Seattle (E.G.C.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute-Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (J. Infante); Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto (M.M.); Atlanta Cancer Care (T.S.) and Georgia Cancer Specialists (M.N.S.) - both in Atlanta; Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow (S.A.T.); Southern Health, East Bentleigh, VIC (M.H.), Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney (D.G.), and Bionomics, Thebarton, SA (J. Iglesias) - all in Australia; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan (M.R.); Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada (S.D.); Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (D.L.); University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (N.B.); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (J.T.); Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid (M.H.); University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (E.V.C.); and Celgene, Summit, NJ (X.W., M.F.R.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a phase 1-2 trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical activity was noted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We conducted a phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of the combination versus gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with a Karnofsky performance-status score of 70 or more (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance status) to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg per square meter) weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles). Patients received the study treatment until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (431 patients) or gemcitabine (430). The median overall survival was 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group as compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). The survival rate was 35% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group versus 22% in the gemcitabine group at 1 year, and 9% versus 4% at 2 years. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, as compared with 3.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001); the response rate according to independent review was 23% versus 7% in the two groups (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (38% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group vs. 27% in the gemcitabine group), fatigue (17% vs. 7%), and neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3% versus 1% of the patients in the two groups. In the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, neuropathy of grade 3 or higher improved to grade 1 or lower in a median of 29 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, but rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00844649.).

摘要

背景

在白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)联合吉西他滨的 1-2 期临床试验中,晚期胰腺癌患者表现出显著的临床活性。我们开展了一项 3 期研究,评估了nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨与吉西他滨单药治疗转移性胰腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们随机分配 Karnofsky 体能状态评分为 70 分或更高(评分范围为 0 至 100,分数越高表示体能状态越好)的患者,接受nab-紫杉醇(125mg/平方米体表面积)联合吉西他滨(1000mg/平方米),每 4 周 1 次,第 1、8 和 15 天;或吉西他滨单药(1000mg/平方米),每周 1 次共 7 天(第 1 周期),然后每 4 周 1 次(第 2 周期和随后的周期)。患者接受研究治疗直至疾病进展。主要终点是总生存期;次要终点是无进展生存期和总缓解率。

结果

共有 861 例患者被随机分配至nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组(431 例)或吉西他滨组(430 例)。nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组的中位总生存期为 8.5 个月,而吉西他滨组为 6.7 个月(死亡风险比,0.72;95%置信区间[CI],0.62 至 0.83;P<0.001)。1 年时,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组的生存率为 35%,而吉西他滨组为 22%;2 年时,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组的生存率为 9%,而吉西他滨组为 4%。nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组的中位无进展生存期为 5.5 个月,而吉西他滨组为 3.7 个月(疾病进展或死亡风险比,0.69;95%CI,0.58 至 0.82;P<0.001);根据独立评估的缓解率,两组分别为 23%和 7%(P<0.001)。3 级或以上的常见不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少症(nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组 38%,吉西他滨组 27%)、疲劳(nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组 17%,吉西他滨组 7%)和周围神经病(nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组 17%,吉西他滨组 1%)。两组中发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率分别为 3%和 1%。在 nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨组中,3 级或以上周围神经病的中位改善时间为 29 天。

结论

在转移性胰腺腺癌患者中,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨显著提高了总生存期、无进展生存期和缓解率,但周围神经病和骨髓抑制的发生率增加。(由 Celgene 资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00844649。)

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索