• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分流量储备对移植物通畅性的影响:系统评价和患者水平的荟萃分析。

Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):730-735. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29864. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29864
PMID:34233071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9546321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of invasive functional guidance for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) on graft failure.

BACKGROUND

Data on the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding CABG are still limited.

METHODS

Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. Primary objective was the risk of graft failure, stratified by FFR. Risk estimates are reported as odds ratios (ORs) derived from the aggregated data using random-effects models. Individual patient data were analyzed using mixed effect model to assess relationship between FFR and graft failure. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180444).

RESULTS

Four prospective studies comprising 503 patients referred for CABG, with 1471 coronaries, assessed by FFR were included. Graft status was available for 1039 conduits at median of 12.0 [IQR 6.6; 12.0] months. Risk of graft failure was higher in vessels with preserved FFR (OR 5.74, 95% CI 1.71-19.29). Every 0.10 FFR units decrease in the coronaries was associated with 56% risk reduction of graft failure (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). FFR cut-off to predict graft failure was 0.79.

CONCLUSION

Surgical grafting of coronaries with functionally nonsignificant stenoses was associated with higher risk of graft failure.

摘要

目的

研究冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中侵袭性功能指导对桥接失败的影响。

背景

关于血流储备分数(FFR)指导 CABG 影响的数据仍然有限。

方法

进行了系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。主要目标是根据 FFR 分层的桥接失败风险。使用随机效应模型从汇总数据中得出风险估计值,报告为比值比(ORs)。使用混合效应模型分析个体患者数据,以评估 FFR 与桥接失败之间的关系。该荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020180444)中注册。

结果

纳入了四项前瞻性研究,共纳入 503 例因 CABG 而接受 FFR 评估的患者,共涉及 1471 支冠状动脉。中位随访时间为 12.0[IQR 6.6;12.0]个月时,可获得 1039 个桥接的状态。在保留 FFR 的血管中,桥接失败的风险更高(OR 5.74,95%CI 1.71-19.29)。每支冠状动脉的 FFR 降低 0.10 单位,桥接失败的风险降低 56%(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.34-0.59)。预测桥接失败的 FFR 截断值为 0.79。

结论

对功能性非狭窄冠状动脉进行手术桥接与桥接失败的风险增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/5c33db58bd74/CCD-99-730-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/6d08fa47d9fb/CCD-99-730-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/d5df8a6659ce/CCD-99-730-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/231f30317d91/CCD-99-730-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/5c33db58bd74/CCD-99-730-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/6d08fa47d9fb/CCD-99-730-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/d5df8a6659ce/CCD-99-730-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/231f30317d91/CCD-99-730-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d1/9546321/5c33db58bd74/CCD-99-730-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.分流量储备对移植物通畅性的影响:系统评价和患者水平的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):730-735. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29864. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.分流量储备与血管造影引导下的冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2732-2743. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043.
3
Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.分流量储备引导与血管造影引导冠状动脉旁路移植术的 6 年随访结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368.
4
Health-Related Quality of Life and Angina in Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: FARGO Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization).血流储备分数与血管造影引导下冠状动脉旁路移植术的健康相关生活质量及心绞痛:FARGO试验(血流储备分数与血管造影随机化用于移植物优化)
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007302. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007302. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI).FFR 指导下与血管造影指导下 CABG 试验(GRAFFITI)后移植通畅性的研究设计。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Aug;11(4):269-273. doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9818-9. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
FFR-guided versus coronary angiogram-guided CABG: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.基于血流储备分数(FFR)指导与冠状动脉造影指导的冠状动脉旁路移植术:前瞻性随机对照试验的综述与荟萃分析
J Card Surg. 2020 Oct;35(10):2785-2793. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14880. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Graft patency and progression of coronary artery disease after CABG assessed by angiography-derived fractional flow reserve.通过血管造影衍生的血流储备分数评估冠状动脉旁路移植术后移植物通畅情况及冠状动脉疾病进展
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.083. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial.FFR 指导下与血管造影指导下冠状动脉旁路移植术后的移植物通畅率:GRAFFITI 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e999-e1005. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463.
9
Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?分数血流储备指导下的冠状动脉旁路移植术:术中生理成像能指导决策吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;146(4):824-835.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
The role of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植手术中血流储备分数的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 May 1;30(5):671-678. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa006.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.虚拟冠状动脉旁路移植术
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 22:rs.3.rs-7320100. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7320100/v1.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting with or without preoperative physiological stenosis assessment: a SWEDEHEART study.冠状动脉旁路移植术伴或不伴术前生理狭窄评估:一项瑞典心脏注册研究
Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3214-3223. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf327.
3
Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者特异性计算模拟。

本文引用的文献

1
Graft patency and progression of coronary artery disease after CABG assessed by angiography-derived fractional flow reserve.通过血管造影衍生的血流储备分数评估冠状动脉旁路移植术后移植物通畅情况及冠状动脉疾病进展
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.083. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
2
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
3
Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0281423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281423. eCollection 2023.
4
Quantitative flow ratio to predict long-term coronary artery bypass graft patency in patients with left main coronary artery disease.定量血流比预测左主干病变患者冠状动脉旁路移植术远期通畅率。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Dec;38(12):2811-2818. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02699-5. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
5
The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术后血流储备分数对临床结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Chest Surg. 2022 Dec 5;55(6):442-451. doi: 10.5090/jcs.22.072. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
FFR 指导下与血管造影指导下冠状动脉旁路移植术后的移植物通畅率:GRAFFITI 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e999-e1005. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463.
4
Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial.术前分流量储备对动脉旁路移植吻合口功能的影响:IMPAG 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 1;40(29):2421-2428. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz329.
5
Long-Term Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Implantation.血流储备分数引导植入术后冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期通畅情况
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007712. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007712.
6
Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.分流量储备与血管造影引导下的冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2732-2743. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043.
7
Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.分流量储备引导与血管造影引导冠状动脉旁路移植术的 6 年随访结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368.
8
Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve.基于血流储备分数指导的 PCI 的 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803538. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影指导的比较(FAME):一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1853-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
10
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.个体参与者数据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA-IPD 声明。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656.